First sentence
Magic mineral solution, usually called MMS, is the popular name of 28% sodium chlorite aqueous solution. Sodium chlorite is a toxic chemical 12345, which can cause fatal renal failure when dissolved in distilled water.
1. Sodium chlorite is a toxic chemical.
The EPA did not list sodium chlorite as a toxic chemical, and the Federal Drug Administration also authorized the use of sodium chlorite before the food was put on the market. At this time, it is likely that everyone in the United States is eating food washed with sodium chlorite. Search the federal registration code (2 1C). F.R. 173.325), you will see that the federal drug administration has approved the use of sodium chlorite in food.
2, causing fatal renal failure.
This is deceiving you and making you think that MMS will really cause kidney failure. This has never happened. It is reported that one person committed suicide by taking10g sodium chlorite. At that time, it did cause renal failure, but the suicide failed and the man finally recovered.
Quote 6 in the sixth paragraph tries to prove that MMS can cause renal failure, but obviously the editor of Wikipedia didn't read the whole link, because the link didn't mention causality, even though the dose of suicide was 1250 times that of MMS.
If you are interested, this link is the sixth quotation 6: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/8290712. In the past 100 years, no one died of renal failure and took sodium chlorite. They listed comments 1 to 5, proving that MMS is a toxic chemical. Maybe you want to look at these notes. These notes either support my point of view or nothing.
References 1 and 3 are invalid links, and nothing can be proved.
Quote 2 is a French scientific journal, which only mentions chlorate, chlorate is not a component of MMS, so this label is invalid.
Quote 4 is a medical report to test the adaptability of animals to sodium chlorite, chlorine dioxide and sodium chlorate. All the data prove my point: MMS can be taken orally. Please read this report by yourself: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en _ GB/document _ library/maximum _ residual _ limits-report/2009/1/wc5000159565438.
Quote 5 is a report by Health Canada, which completely repeats the statement of the Federal Drug Administration. Neither the FDA nor Health Canada gave any evidence or cited any tests. I called to ask if they had followed up the people who called to complain about stomachache and hypotension. They said no, they didn't investigate these complaints.
Did you get a look at him? Wikipedia editors regard the government statement as the golden rule. But like everyone else, the statement of government agencies should also have evidence. In the case of MMS, the government did not and could not provide evidence, because there was no evidence. The government just made it clear that it wants to protect large pharmaceutical companies, and expected people to believe these statements, because they were issued by the government.
3.MMS is 28% sodium chlorite solution.
This is correct, but they are making us mistakenly think that this 28% solution will lead to fatal renal failure. As mentioned above, it will not cause renal failure. There has never been renal failure caused by sodium chlorite since its existence.
At the same time, the concentration of one dose of MMS is by no means 28%. The actual concentration is 0.016%-11750 times the concentration they want you to believe. Please read the plan 1000. At http://http://www. jimhumble.biz, I will tell you how to get MMS. At the same time, the Federal Drug Administration is fooling people into believing that the concentration of MMS taken directly is 28%.
When edible acid is mixed with MMS, sodium chlorite reacts. Therefore:
No one uses chlorine dioxide instead of sodium chlorite when taking MMS.
The editor of Wikipedia wants to confuse people with a dose of sodium chlorite with MMS concentration of 28%-the fact is 0.0 16% chlorine dioxide solution.
By stating that MMS is a 28% sodium chlorite solution, it will cause all kinds of terrible harm, and they want to mislead you further. When we started studying chemistry in high school, we knew that "any chemical substance is toxic if used in excess." The concentration of a dose of MMS is only11750 that they used to mislead you. They want you to believe that the concentration of MMS you are taking is 28%, but it is actually 0.0 16%. They can scare a cancer patient not to take MMS, and the cancer industry can earn an extra $800,000. Please visit www.jimhumble.biz to read my MMS scheme and learn more details about the MMS concentration of 0.0 16%.
The second and third sentences
MMS reacts with the citric acid solution in the instructions to produce chlorine dioxide, which is a strong oxidant for purifying water and bleaching. The name 7MMS was first named by the author Jim Humber, who gave the name in his own book "The Magic Mineral Solution of 2 1 century" published in 2006.
There are several misleading places in these two sentences. For the first time, the editor of Wikipedia wrote how to prepare a multimedia message. Then, they mentioned that chlorine dioxide is used to purify water and bleach. They are referring to a deer as a horse, and many people are reading their articles.
They didn't mention that the concentration of bleach was 1750 times that of a dose of MMS, and in many cases it was more than 1 1,000,000 times. (that is, there is more chlorine dioxide in the solution)
Please visit www.jimhumble.biz for instructions on making MMS. A drop of MMS contains 6 mg of chlorine dioxide. Scheme 1000 is: 3 drops per hour, taken with half a glass of water. This is a solution with a concentration of 0.0 16%, which is harmless to human body. Many people put it into their eyes several times a day to treat pinkeye (just one example). It is also suitable for most other eye diseases.
Are you beginning to realize that they are cheating? These unscrupulous people don't care about life and death, even themselves and their relatives. Their lies and deception reduce people's chances of curing diseases every day.
There is no doubt that I think their salary comes from pharmaceutical companies, although it seems not. These desperate people are like Judas, selling their souls for a few dollars. However, following the footsteps of money, we should remember that pharmaceutical companies can earn $800,000 from each cancer patient. If they can stop MMS from spreading in Africa, they will get millions of dollars from selling malaria drugs.
The fourth and fifth sentences
MMS is touted as being able to treat HIV, malaria, hepatitis, virus, flu, cold, acne, cancer and many other diseases. However, reliable scientific evidence proves that the use of this substance will only cause harm and has no clinical effect; The argument that the curative effect is good only comes from anecdotal reports and Jim Humber's book. 9 10
Yes, we did say that MMS can treat all these diseases. What's the matter? More than 1 10,000/5 million people have used MMS. At present, the United States, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, more than 20 European countries, many countries in South America, South Korea, Japan and many other countries.
The editor of Wikipedia said: "The statement of good curative effect only comes from anecdotal reports and Jim Humber's book."
They didn't point out that there were thousands of such anecdotes.
Any real scientist will agree that so many anecdotes can constitute important evidence. Jim Humber's books have sold 200,000 times worldwide, and the number of free e-books downloaded has exceeded 6,543.8+0,000 times.
Reliable scientific evidence proves that the use of this substance will only cause harm. ...
They tried to cheat people in secret. There is no "reliable scientific evidence" in the world to support them to denigrate the harm caused by using MMS. They just fabricated it out of thin air and compiled it into Wikipedia, hoping that the public would accept it without thinking. Worst of all, they added a reference of 9 10, and the two notes had nothing to do with MMS.
Quote 9 is a warning letter warning a woman not to sell herbs and MMS. The letter said that she could not sell MMS, nor could she post information on how to use MMS on her website.
Reference 10 is a story without any data support at all.
These notes don't mention what MMS is at all, nor do they mention that some scientists and users have proved that MMS is dangerous.
900,000 people die every year from medicines prescribed by doctors. however
No one died from taking MMS.
Critics attack MMS, but they just can't find any evidence that MMS is harmful. They hope to have some similar reliable scientific evidence to prove that MMS is harmful, but it just doesn't.
Organizations around the world, similar to the United States Federal Drug Administration, are constantly copying each other's information, but there is no organization, not even a survey or written record about some people's stomachaches caused by MMS. The US Federal Drug Administration claimed that someone called to complain, but they didn't investigate these calls.
They even claimed that one of them called to say that he had low blood pressure. The call was exaggerated to the point where they said it was "life-threatening" hypotension. Every complaint received by the Federal Drug Administration was dramatized to the point that the caller was dying, but these complaints were not investigated. Do you know why now?
If the investigation finds that there is no problem, you can't make a statement that there is a problem.
In the Netherlands, an organization similar to the Federal Drug Administration reported hypotension after taking MMS, but the wording was exactly the same as that of the US Federal Drug Administration. This is an interesting coincidence, because MMS has rarely caused hypotension before. They tried to produce some evidence, but they found the wrong clinical symptoms. Third, as I said, this institution in the Netherlands did not investigate this report of hypotension. When they get the so-called evidence, they are usually happy to provide details; But they just said it happened, but didn't give any further information. In my opinion, this Dutch institution is just copying the statement of the US Federal Drug Administration.
The rest of the article is "safe"
Wikipedia staff edited low blood pressure, vomiting and diarrhea cited by the Federal Drug Administration and Health Canada. However, the two institutions did not further investigate the complaints of low blood pressure and stomachache, nor did they give other evidence. Moreover, Wikipedia's quotation can't prove anything.
The quotation 14 is an article written by a boy of 15 years old. He doesn't believe that anything can cure all diseases. This does not apply to MMS at all.
The reference 15 16 is also not applicable. Quoting 15 is just another announcement of the Canadian Food Standards Agency, and MMS should not be used, but no evidence is provided. The quote 16 reminds us again that MMS may be dangerous, but they did not provide any clinical trials, chemical principles or any other types of data to support their statement: "Warning: Do not use MMS."
Quoting 17 is an idiot. It is said that MMS is a solution with a concentration of 28% (actually, the concentration is 0.0 16%), and the mixture of sodium chlorite and citric acid will produce chlorine dioxide, and it is clearly stated that "... the concentration is exactly the same as that of industrial bleach."
Yes, sodium chlorite is indeed used as a bleaching agent in industry. What's wrong with that? Vinegar and many acids are also used as industrial bleaching agents, and salt also has many industrial uses. They tried their best to make MMS sound terrible, but they just didn't mention that the sodium chlorite concentration of MMS was one thousandth of that of industrial bleach.
Please visit my website www.jimbumble.biz The instructions in it show that the dose of MMS is very weak.
MMS is dangerous only when it is used in large quantities, so is salt, and so is any chemical substance on the earth.
Are you clear? Without any facts, the editors of the Federal Drug Administration and Wikipedia want to confuse the audience. In this report, they don't want the public to read those quotations and then find that they are nonsense. Unfortunately, most people don't read those quotations. They think, "Wow, there are so many quotations. This report must be true." However, a person will not be confused, and some people will read this explanation of the facts.
Web page link
First of all, please think more about the description of chlorine dioxide in Baidu Encyclopedia. And Wikipedia's criticism of Jim is unsafe! Who is right after all? Jim doesn't use sodium chlorite, but it will react with edible acid. These substances are chlorine dioxide and sodium citrate! Enter the body and release a hydrogen ion to catch two electrons, which is twice as oxidizing as ozone! The product is just a few grains of salt in half an hour!
Mms 1 chlorine dioxide is only a strong oxidation, which is actually safe for human cells. The positive charge of 0.95 is not too big, and the osmotic pressure is safe!
Many harmful bacteria are anaerobic (except fungi) and all viruses are anaerobic! Because viruses with incomplete DNA need a negative environment to protect their incomplete DNA, they rely on normal cells to parasitize, and their membranes are negatively charged! It is found that the cell membranes of some parasites are also in a negative anaerobic state!
Viruses are smaller and easier to explode than bacteria. Viruses are not bacteria and lack a membrane. So MMS can kill viruses almost 100%!
Please don't let the fda judge the fda on Wikipedia. This is ridiculous.
The above is my personal opinion! For reference only!