In the book, it was Zhu Tong who released Classical and Sung River. Why does the play give all the credit to Lei Heng, who ranks lower than him, has worse martial arts and more bad habits? Fang La was caught, but he was caught on TV.
Because the role of Lei Heng is easier to run through from "Chaotian Wang recognizes the meaning of Dongxi Village" to "Chaotian Wang is in Song Gongming", which makes the plot coherent and conforms to the law of series creation. There is a similar treatment in The Journey to the West, for example, the two kings of Yuhua Prefecture and Destroying Law were combined into one, and the credit for the Monkey King's recovery of the national treasure of the sacrificial country was given to Xiaobailong. This kind of treatment is very reasonable in the overall thinking of TV series.
In the history books, Han Shizhong captured Fang La, in the Water Margin, Lu captured Fang La 100, and in the Water Margin, there was 120. In the Water Margin drama, there was a famous single-handedly captured Fang La, among which the single-handedly captured Fang La was the most tragic and widely circulated among the people. (In fact, the legend of capturing Fang La predates the legend of capturing Fang La by Lu.)
Based on The Water Margin 100, the TV series absorbed the relevant adaptation and research results of The Water Margin, and grasped the connotation of The Water Margin and the culture of the Song Dynasty very standard. There are also great defects.
Song Jiang is not stupid. From the original works or TV series, we can see that Song Jiang is a loyal boss in Liangshan. He is always looking for fame for Liangshan brothers and Shui Bo Liangshan, and is busy for everyone to have a good home. Liangshan can have such a fate, it is not the fault of Song Jiang, nor the fault of Liangshan heroes. It can only show that the darkness of the court at that time was the result of the treacherous court official taking power. If Song Jiang, like Fang La, has only 108 generals, how can he be an opponent of the imperial court?
From TV, I always see that the director asks Li to repeat it over and over again, and he tries to win over his brothers through the back door.
In the book, I only saw that he had to accept the court's appeal for his father's advice, but he killed countless brothers. After his death, he just shed a few dry tears for show. More often, when he heard that a brother had died, he became furious and pretended to attack the enemy himself. As a result, several brothers died trying to save him.
Killing Li Kui jy in the end is the most inconsiderate place for him. He only thinks about his reputation. Who cares if the other brothers live or die!
What is the significance of Lu's adaptation? Personally, I like Lu Shenzhi on TV because of the look in his eyes when Song Jiang surrendered and Lin Chong died, but he did not appear in the water margin army after Dasong surrendered. I really can't think of anything to explain.
Song Wu and San Ruan also opposed to woo, and they followed Song Jiang desperately. Now that the director has arranged for Gongsun Sheng to leave, there is no need to arrange for another Lu to leave. Lu is an important figure among Liangshan heroes. Let him go, I think it is a disgraceful move to the protagonist Lu, which means a little afraid of death. The TV series "Water Margin" indicates that the original authors are Shi Naian and Luo Guanzhong, which has aroused many viewers' doubts.
it's a long story
During the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, the most widely circulated version of Water Margin was Guan Huatang, that is, a commentary on Jin Shengtan written by Shi Naian (70th edition). From the founding of the People's Republic of China to the Cultural Revolution, the most widely circulated version of Water Margin was the revised version of People's Literature Publishing House, and its title author was still Shi Naian. At the same time, in many literary works, the copyright of Water Margin belongs to Shi Naian alone. Therefore, for a long time, the view that "The Water Margin was written by Shi Naian" left a deep impression on people. As a matter of fact, there have always been many opinions about the author of Water Margin, and "Shi Naian's Works" is just one of them. Aside from those absurd statements (for example, The Water Margin was compiled by the father of Yao Zongzhen, the governor of the county), in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, there were three main statements in the notes and bibliographic records of scholars: (1) Luo Guanzhong wrote in Lang Ying's Seventh Edition and Tian Rucheng's Notes on the West Lake.
(2) Shi Naian and Luo Guanzhong co-authored the narration of Hundred Rivers Record, Jiajing edition of Water Margin (8 existing Beijing Library), Preface to Tiandu Foreign History, Preface to Yuan Yin, Preface to Li Zhuowu Printed Edition, Preface to Wuhu Old Man Printed by Xue Ying Caotang and Preface to Mustard Garden Printed Edition.
(3) Shi Naian's titles include Xiongfei Pavilion and Flower Watching Hall in Water Margin, Hu Yinglin's Shao Shi Fang Shan Pen Cong, Xu's Talking about the Old Committee of Three Villages, Xu Shupi's Notes on Knowledge, Hui Zhou's Trivia of Jinling, Qian Xiyan's Defects in Play and Liu Shiyi's New Knowledge of Playing Yi Xuan.
Which statement is the most reliable or more reliable?
Let's talk about the records of scholars first.
The first statement first appeared in Lang Ying (1487- 1566)' s Seven Revisions. Lang Ying was from Jiajing, Ming Dynasty. The second statement was first seen in Gao Ru's Hundred Rivers Record. The date of Gao Ru's birth and death is unknown, but the Preface to Hundred Rivers contains the preface of the 19th year of Jiajing in Gao Ru (1540), which shows that he and Lang Ying are also Jiajing people. The third statement was first seen in Hu Yinglin's Collection of Shaoshi Mountain (155 1- 1602). Hu Yinglin is a Wanli. Therefore, the first statement and the second statement are undoubtedly earlier than the third statement in terms of their respective time.
From the head of the water margin.
The first statement can't be found in any existing version of the title department. The version with the second statement as the title department mostly appeared in Jiajing and Wanli periods of Ming Dynasty, and the two versions of the third statement appeared in Chongzhen period at the end of Ming Dynasty. Therefore, the third statement is later than the first statement and the second statement in terms of time.
Does this mean that the first statement and the second statement are more reliable and the third statement is the least reliable? Not necessarily.
The first way is probably the most unreliable. As we know, Luo Guanzhong is the author of The Romance of Three Kingdoms. At this point, there is no dispute. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Water Margin are completely useless in language form. The former uses simple classical Chinese. The latter is a popular vernacular. It is difficult to get people's approval that it was written by the same author.
Although the second statement and the third statement appeared earlier or later, they have one thing in common: Shi Naian is the author or one of the authors, and they actually support each other. So from this point of view, it is more reliable.
The second statement co-authored by Shi Naian and Luo Guanzhong has some truth. But unfortunately, it is not clear what kind of cooperative relationship they are: who is the master and who is the second? Judging by common sense, it can't be exactly 50% to 50%, which is not so coincidental.
In the Qing Dynasty, someone (such as Xu, the author of the 100 Eight Commanders of Water Margin) completed the division of labor between history and Luo, and gave the first 70 chapters back to Luo Guanzhong. This is just a conjecture made out of nothing, and it appears too late: 120 and 70 editions of Water Margin will sprout in people's minds after they become popular.
To understand their cooperative relationship more accurately, at present, the only way is to examine the inscription of the author of Water Margin in Ming Dynasty: "Shi Naian's book, edited by Luo Guanzhong"; Jiajing Ben, Preface to the History of Heaven and Earth, published by Yuan, edited by Luo Guanzhong.
The so-called "Deben" is the common language of Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties. That is, "true copy" and "compilation" are "writing". This shows that Shi Naian is the author as well as the author. The so-called "editing" can be interpreted as "editing", which has the same meaning as "editing". This is equivalent to saying that Luo Guanzhong is an editor, or an organizer and processor.
Therefore, first of all, the copyright of Shi Naian should be clearly confirmed; Second, Luo Guanzhong participated in the creative process. He is a collaborator of Shi Naian and should be treated fairly.
Based on the above understanding, I think, in a narrow sense, Shi Naian is the author of Water Margin; Broadly speaking, Water Margin is the product of cooperation between Shi Naian and Luo Guanzhong.
In short, the TV series "Water Margin" indicates that the original author is Shi and Luo, which is justified and understandable.
Query on the report of TV series "Water Margin"
In the book, it was Zhu Tong who released Classical and Sung River. Why does the play give all the credit to Lei Heng, who ranks lower than him, has worse martial arts and more bad habits? Fang La was caught, but he was caught on TV.
Because the role of Lei Heng is easier to run through from "Chaotian Wang recognizes the meaning of Dongxi Village" to "Chaotian Wang is in Song Gongming", which makes the plot coherent and conforms to the law of series creation. There is a similar treatment in The Journey to the West, for example, the two kings of Yuhua Prefecture and Destroying Law were combined into one, and the credit for the Monkey King's recovery of the national treasure of the sacrificial country was given to Xiaobailong. This kind of treatment is very reasonable in the overall thinking of TV series.
In the history books, Han Shizhong captured Fang La, in the Water Margin, Lu captured Fang La 100, and in the Water Margin, there was 120. In the Water Margin drama, there was a famous single-handedly captured Fang La, among which the single-handedly captured Fang La was the most tragic and widely circulated among the people. (In fact, the legend of capturing Fang La predates the legend of capturing Fang La by Lu.)
Based on The Water Margin 100, the TV series absorbed the relevant adaptation and research results of The Water Margin, and grasped the connotation of The Water Margin and the culture of the Song Dynasty very standard. There are also great defects.
Song Jiang is not stupid. From the original works or TV series, we can see that Song Jiang is a loyal boss in Liangshan. He is always looking for fame for Liangshan brothers and Shui Bo Liangshan, and is busy for everyone to have a good home. Liangshan can have such a fate, it is not the fault of Song Jiang, nor the fault of Liangshan heroes. It can only show that the darkness of the court at that time was the result of the treacherous court official taking power. If Song Jiang, like Fang La, has only 108 generals, how can he be an opponent of the imperial court?
From TV, I always see that the director asks Li to repeat it over and over again, and he tries to win over his brothers through the back door.
In the book, I only saw that he had to accept the court's appeal for his father's advice, but he killed countless brothers. After his death, he just shed a few dry tears for show. More often, when he heard that a brother had died, he became furious and pretended to attack the enemy himself. As a result, several brothers died trying to save him.
Killing Li Kui jy in the end is the most inconsiderate place for him. He only thinks about his reputation. Who cares if the other brothers live or die!
What is the significance of Lu's adaptation? Personally, I like Lu Shenzhi on TV because of the look in his eyes when Song Jiang surrendered and Lin Chong died, but he did not appear in the water margin army after Dasong surrendered. I really can't think of anything to explain.
Song Wu and San Ruan, who were also opposed to wooing, followed Song Jiang desperately. Now that the director has arranged for Gongsun Sheng to leave, there is no need to arrange another Lu to leave. Lu is an important figure among Liangshan heroes. Let him go. I think this is a disgraceful move to the protagonist Lu, which means a little death.
Lin Chong's anger is more tragic, which can arouse the audience's * * * and set off Song Jiang's stupidity.
Although in order to achieve this effect, it is possible for ordinary viewers.
But it's a little for us real water margin fans.
Because if you want to change it, you must change it Lin Chong, with such high martial arts, has been in Liangshan for so long that he never thought of revenge. It was not until Liangshan Water Army caught Gao Qiu that he thought of reporting. It was really a blockbuster and shocked him to death. Besides, think about it. If Gao is caught in the mountains, how many chances he will kill. Lin Chong stayed in the mountains for so long that he couldn't kill many friends himself. He returned to Gao.
Lu's adaptation seems to be based on Gongsun Sheng's retirement. In the original work, Song Jiang fulfilled his promise to let Gongsun Sheng go back to monasticism and serve his mother and master. However, Gongsun Sheng in TV has actually become a secondary role, because the superstitious plot of this practice has been deleted. Therefore, it is more impressive to arrange the plot on Lu, who is also a monk, and let a protagonist express the content of retirement. At the same time, referring to other literary works, he gave Song Wu the task of catching Fang La.
Lu's departure is related to Lin Chong's death. He has given up any illusions about Song Jiang. The TV series is actually "pulling one hair and moving the whole body." In order to highlight the tragic significance, the structure has been adjusted. Personality is more prominent.
There is a view that the TV series is so angry with Lin Chong's arrangement that although it can give the audience a strong sensory effect, it deeply violates the original idea. Lin Chong expressed in the original work is a cowardly person. If he is angry because he can't get revenge, he will become a "strongman" with a contradictory personality.
Regardless of the above point of view, I personally think it can be filmed according to the original work, that is, Lin Chong got sick when the army was stationed in Hangzhou after begging for wax, and died of a serious illness after living in Liuhe Temple for half a year. In fact, the original writing is not to ignore Lin Chong. When reading this passage, if you can think of Lin Chong's revenge and ambition, and the hero "landed silently" in Jiangnan and died silently, you can better understand the meaning of the tragedy.
If you want to ask how to shoot it like that, it's easy. Give a "six months later" shot. When Lin Chong was seriously ill, he took care of him and said that he only hated Lin's grievances, but it was all over. Although the shock is not enough, it is even more tragic. You can also avoid misleading so many people.
Lin Chong and Lu are the biggest adaptors. Ah, why not adapt the three Ruan Wusong? In the TV series, I really feel that their images are very tall, and they are all opposed to wooing, but they still follow Fang La. Finally, they helped Song Jiang not to be repelled after his success, but none of them came to a good end. The unanimous view is that San Ruan is a classical school, but although they are dissatisfied with Song Jiang on TV, they are also United as one enemy, better than Lu on TV.
You're right, it's really just the only protagonist who can leave Song Jiang.
In fact, I not only questioned TV, but also questioned the original work. Song Jiang: Why is the Jianghu so famous? He just said it was timely rain, and as long as he gave money to people in the street, he could become famous all over the world. There was no news broadcast at that time. If it's just poverty alleviation, it's good to have a nickname in Yuncheng at most. According to Song Jiang's family style, he can't have a deep friendship with men in the underworld, but when he saw this Song Jiang, he was said to have been famous for a long time, but he was in trouble. I really don't know what makes me foolhardy.
Compared with ancient novels, it is better than the novels of veteran Jin. Although the capacity is smaller than the Water Margin, the characters are better than the ancient novels in plot.
An anti-poem by Xunyang Jiang dares to laugh at Huang Chao's failure to be a husband, which has nothing to do with the back. If you really wrote such an anti-poem, it would be more successful than Huang Zuo, but it turned into surrender.
By the way, Song Jiang is a black and white artist. As an official, he tipped off the underworld to escape arrest and gain a reputation in the underworld. At the same time, I gave him the underworld as a thank-you money to help the white people. This may be one of the reasons why he is famous everywhere.
& lt& lt Water Margin >> In Chinese, Lu took part in World War I in Fang La, and finally "stayed in Zhejiang". On TV, Lu did not take part in the war and directly converted to Buddhism.
According to legend, when Fang La surrendered, thunderbolt Qin Ming was shot to death by his men with a dark arrow when he confronted Fang Jie one-on-one. Is it really him who was shot dead by an arrow caught in a net on TV?
It seems that it is really not easy to adapt famous works, especially works like Water Margin. Many things in it are too confusing to be modified. Adaptation should not only make the public like it, but also lose the charm of the original.
Also, the expression of film and television is different from that of novels, so the adaptation should not only study the Water Margin in depth, but also be familiar with the characteristics of film and television.
Why only about forty people appear in TV series?
In Fang La's three episodes, such as Fang La's soul rushing to the Golden Gate and blood-stained Wulongling, these simple episodes.
The main general with a performance of only about 30?