Article 6.0.8 of the Classification Standard has made this provision, and some explanations have been made in its provisions. The key point here is the escape ability of personnel. Universities or adults have the consciousness of self-protection and the ability to escape when the earthquake comes. Children or minors are not necessarily. Therefore, this regulation is mainly to protect minors. In principle, seismic fortification is not considered in non-seismic areas. To make a very excessive analogy, there is no earthquake, so how can we resist earthquakes? Of course, considering the uncertainty of earthquakes, such as a large earthquake in a low-intensity area, earthquakes may occur in places where there have been no earthquakes before. This needs to be discussed with the local administrative department and the graphic examination center. Our practice here is: seismic fortification is not considered in non-seismic areas. However, we have also seen buildings that need key fortification or complex high-rise buildings in non-seismic areas, which need to be considered according to the 6-degree fortification. It means improvement or something. I consulted the chief engineer of our institute on this issue, and got the answer: in seismic fortification areas, complex buildings or buildings above key fortification categories, it is quantitative or seismic to improve the seismic grade. But if the earthquake resistance is improved to earthquake resistance, it is a qualitative change. You said to raise it to 6 degrees, and I said to raise it to 7 degrees, so there is no argument. Therefore, since we are not sure, the code will prevail, regardless of earthquake resistance. By the way, our chief engineer also said that our place was earthquake-resistant in the 1980 s and was fortified at 6 degrees. Later, it became aseismic in the 1990s, and now it has become a 6-degree seismic fortification. According to the seismic code itself, there is great uncertainty in the current zoning map. Regarding the question of whether vocational colleges need improvement, I happen to be a dormitory and library in a vocational college. At that time, I also encountered this problem, and the final solution was this: I consulted the Seismological Bureau, the Construction Bureau, and the Tukao Center. If the students enrolled in the college are high school graduates, they may not be promoted. If the college recruits junior high school graduates, it must be upgraded to undergraduate courses. If both students are enrolled, considering that the dormitory may rotate, it should be improved in principle. I hope I can help you.