1, the origin of this sentence is actually what Cao Cao said, which is Cao Cao's comment on the art of war. Hector's lack of merit does not mean that he has not made great achievements, but that he has never fought an unprepared battle. Before launching the war, they anticipated the success or failure and made themselves invincible. It's normal to win, and you won't lose badly if you lose. This is called a good soldier. As for those battles that cost him a lot to win, or those battles that have won or lost, they are basically not good soldiers. And they are winners themselves, so they have no prominent position in history.
2. Good Soldiers I think there are three kinds of good soldiers. One is to defeat the enemy without fighting and win without fighting; Second, there is no particularly severe experience of turning defeat into victory, but every battle you fight is a victory; Third, a defeat without rout can minimize the loss of the battle that is about to be lost. Only those who can do these three things can be called good soldiers. They have military exploits, but they are not particularly famous, nor are they famous for turning defeat into victory or winning more with less. But when they fight, it is the most reassuring, because they have never lost.
3, the inspiration of managers I think this kind of inspiration to managers is that when doing one thing and choosing, the company will not be put in danger. Almost all the choices you make are beneficial to the company and can make the company develop steadily. Although it can't soar, it will never let the company decline. Excellent soldiers are most suitable for managing enterprises.