Some knowledge points of high school mathematics, such as complex numbers and reasoning proof, are very simple in the college entrance examination, and they are not even tested. Why do you have to brush a lot of questions in the learning process? I don't understand. Hello LZ

The complex number is 100%, which is basically a fill-in-the-blank problem, or choose and support the complex plane to solve several simple problems.

Because it is a simple question, students at any level should not lose points on this issue. In the case that everyone does not lose points, the time to solve the problem becomes more important.

Therefore, the brush problem of complex modules focuses on the time-consuming training of unit problem operation speed, and does not train eccentric problems.

Don't underestimate simple questions. Others spend 10 second, and you spend 1 minute. The big problem behind parsec is more time to think.

Reasoning proves that the college entrance examination is a comprehensive problem of other topics. Need to prove the national examination paper many times. As a result, 80% of the students regard it as sufficient proof, and the result is a tragedy of wasting time and giving 0 points.

There is also the finale of functional inequality synthesis. The mathematical induction of scale is not simple, and the simplest is the reduction to absurdity (using the true and false characteristics of negative propositions)

There is really no need to brush the topic separately, but please be sure to have the common sense of this chapter in your mind. When the topic is stuck, don't really think backwards to disprove it, or solve the problem like analysis is sometimes fatal (of course, the most important thing is that you don't disprove the topic if you ask for the necessary conditions, and it is more important to avoid such a low-level zero score)