1, the score should be struck while the iron is hot to avoid procrastination and forgetting your answers. After the exam, it is best not to check the answers with your classmates. After getting the answer, try to recall your own answer and write it on the test questions, then read the answer and thoroughly understand the requirements of the standard answer, and finally score according to the scoring standard.
2, the assessment should be realistic, loose and moderate. The so-called seeking truth from facts means that the score should not be affected by the usual exam results, but should be correctly evaluated according to the actual answer sheet of the college entrance examination. The so-called leniency and moderation means that you can be lenient if you grasp it accurately. If you are not sure, or can't remember the answer clearly, you must strictly grasp it.
3. Generally, the principle of inconsistent tightness before and after scoring is adopted. Generally, the principle of "strict liberal arts and loose science" can be adopted, that is, the liberal arts can be considered to drop 5- 10 points after examination; After science evaluation, you can consider floating 5 points. In this way, the scores can complement each other, and the total score will not be very different.
When you can't make up your mind, most experts teach you how to evaluate your score accurately, and ask the teacher to judge or estimate it. If some candidates' estimates are inaccurate for many times, then the first estimate is often the most accurate.
If you don't remember the answer clearly, you can try to do it again first, and then evaluate the score, which will be more accurate.
6, you can use the "average method" evaluation. You can estimate a minimum score strictly and a maximum score loosely, and then take the average of the two as the correct score.
Two, the assessment should consider the following four situations:
1, it is necessary to consider whether there are steps or arguments missing or some symbols are not standardized when answering questions, and points are often deducted appropriately.
2. If the final answer is wrong, you should also consider the possibility of scoring, because some steps may be right. However, at this time, the score is estimated to be lower.
3. Usually, we should consider the tightness of the teacher's marking. For example, teachers in key middle schools are generally strict in marking papers, and students can relax when marking.
4. The cleanliness of the roll surface should be considered. If the roll surface is dirty, it should be properly strict.
Third, correctly estimate the position of your grades among the candidates in this school and this province, and fill in the appropriate volunteers according to the admission scores of colleges and universities over the years. (Reporter Wang Qiaoling, Zhang Yaqun)
English: Pay attention to the key points of the answer.
Perhaps most candidates think that Chinese evaluation is the most difficult, because the subjective questions of Chinese are difficult to grasp, but candidates will find that the score of Chinese papers fluctuates the least through the usual exams. Therefore, it is suggested that candidates may wish to refer to their usual Chinese scores when evaluating their scores. For example, the writing level of the same candidate generally does not fluctuate too much, so the score of each mock exam will be close to that of the college entrance examination. In addition, for poetry appreciation, modern text analysis, etc. Pay attention to comparing the similarities and differences between your own answers and standard answers, be good at analyzing and grasping the main points of standard answers, and check whether you have mastered these points.
Math: Grasping the Digging Point
It is relatively easy to evaluate the scores of math test papers. First of all, both multiple-choice questions and fill-in-the-blank questions have clear and unique standard answers. Candidates only need to compare carefully. Facing the problem-solving part, the evaluation scores are different because of the different levels of candidates. For candidates with excellent grades, it is generally more clear whether they have grasped the scoring points in the answer. In addition to proofreading the final answers, such candidates can also carefully examine what they felt "unsure" at that time, and it is not difficult to estimate their scores by comparing with the standard answers. For students who usually have average or unstable math scores, special attention should be paid to the evaluation, because such candidates often solve problems irregularly, so even if they answer correctly, they may not get full marks. For the candidates who don't study well at ordinary times, they should find their own score points from the standard answers, so as to accumulate their own scores.
Foreign Language: Please let your composition pass the examination.
In foreign language papers, multiple-choice questions account for the vast majority, so it is easier to grade, and the answer to the error-correcting part of the two-volume composition is unique, so the key to accurate grading lies in written expression, that is, the composition part. Whether the candidates with good grades or those with poor grades, it is best to retell their exam compositions on paper after the exam. For candidates with good foreign language scores, the evaluation of the composition part can be completed by correcting each other between students to see if there are omissions or grammatical and writing errors; Candidates with unsatisfactory foreign language scores can be corrected by some experienced teachers, which is of great benefit to accurate evaluation.
Physics: Pay attention to "grading step by step"
There are some differences between the evaluation of physics papers and that of mathematics papers. First of all, many multiple-choice questions in physics papers are multiple-choice, and candidates are likely to forget the options at that time because of factors such as nervousness. If this happens, candidates should immediately calm down and re-do the questions in order to recall the scenes and ideas at that time. As for the experimental questions, it may be the elastic part of the physics test paper, especially some open experimental questions, and there is no so-called standard answer. At this time, if candidates are not sure about their answers, they can have necessary discussions with the teacher. For the evaluation of physical calculation questions, candidates should fully understand the meaning of the word "grading step by step", especially for difficult questions, most candidates may not get the final result, but if candidates can express clearly when analyzing physical processes and using physical formulas, they can also get considerable scores.
Chemistry: Don't let go of details.
In science subjects, chemistry test papers may be difficult to evaluate, because with the decrease of the total number of chemistry test questions in college entrance examination papers, the proportion of written narrative questions is gradually increasing. Of course, most written narrative questions have a unique answer, but some questions are very flexible. If candidates feel it is necessary, they can also seek the help of teachers as appropriate. In addition, special attention should be paid to details, such as "chemical equation" and "ionic equation". If we ignore these aspects, we will lose unnecessary marks or inaccurate marks.
Politics: the combination of "choosing points" and "taking ideas"
The difficulty of political evaluation is mainly subjective. First of all, we should not only consider whether our answer is correct, but also consider whether the answer is complete. If the answers are incomplete, we can't get high marks no matter how much we discuss. Secondly, the answers to political standards in recent years are more flexible and not as detailed as before, so we should combine "choosing points" with "choosing ideas" when grading. As long as the meaning expressed is close to the standard answer and the expression is clear and clear, you can give yourself extra points appropriately.
History: refining the main points of scoring
At present, the marking of historical subjective questions is mainly based on points, especially material analysis questions and explanatory texts. Therefore, after getting the answer, candidates should first calmly analyze and study how many questions there are, how many points there are, and what the score is, and then refine the main points of the score answer; Then, carefully check your answers according to your memory, compare them point by point, and mark the scores. Whether your answer is consistent with the standard answer, what points are missing, and whether the organization is clear. Whether the expression is accurate or not, we must know fairly well. Papers in disorder, appropriate deduction of 2 points.
Geography: Don't add points easily if the expression is inaccurate.
First of all, if you locate a geographical thing in advance, and then ask questions continuously, if there is a judgment error in the first step, don't give yourself extra points even if you get it right later, because your premise is wrong; Readers will no longer look down. Second, we must grasp the key points. Although your answer is close to the standard answer, there is no key score point, so you can't add this, because geography marking is to find the key point; Again, don't easily add points where the expression is inaccurate. When answering questions, candidates think they are clearly expressed, but the actual expression is different from that in the textbook, and the result is often lost.