For example:
The first is the most common question type, which is also the earliest question type of analogical reasoning. Is to give two words and then choose a set of answers.
Sunlight: ultraviolet rays
A. computer: radiation B. seawater: sodium chloride C. mixture: element D. microwave oven: microwave.
That is, according to the relationship between sunlight and ultraviolet rays, the relationship between seawater and sodium chloride is the relationship between the whole and its components, so the answer is B.
Question 2
The second kind of question is to give three words and then choose a set of answers.
Exam: Student: Grade
A. Communication: User: E-mail. B. car: driver: driver's license. C. job: employee: salary. D. Meal: Chef: It's delicious and delicious.
This question gives a combination of three words, and then the relationship is more complicated. Not only the relationship between the first word and the second word, but also the relationship between the second word and the third word, and sometimes even the relationship between the first word and the third word, can we find a "breakthrough". For example, in the above question, we can know that "students get grades through exams", then we can get "employees get wages through work" by analogy, and then get the correct answer C.
What is analogical reasoning? Give examples. Analogical reasoning is a common method in scientific research. In the19th century, when physicists studied the properties of light, they made an analogy between light and sound. Sound has linear propagation, reflection and refraction because of its fluctuation. Later, it was discovered that light also had these phenomena, so it was speculated that "light may also fluctuate." (Excerpted from Compulsory Biology in Senior Two)
Types of legal reasoning. For example, the following statement about the type of legal reasoning is incorrect: the driver Zhang suddenly had a heart attack while driving and parked his car in a place marked "No parking here, offenders will be fined 100 yuan", but Zhang was not punished in the end. This is the result of dialectical reasoning. Before the criminal law was revised, there was no new judicial interpretation for reference. A people's court applied the provisions of Article 5 of the Criminal Law to the judgment of difficult cases, that is, the severity of punishment should be commensurate with the crimes committed and the criminal responsibilities assumed by criminals. Deductive reasoning is used here. In the trial practice, the Supreme People's Court compares several judgments of similar cases in lower courts, and chooses cases that can be used for reference by other courts. The method of combining inductive reasoning with analogical reasoning is adopted here. If the lawn in front of the door is wet and it is observed that if it rains at night, the lawn will also be wet, then we can draw the conclusion that it rained last night. Hypothetical reasoning is used here.
What is analogical reasoning? Analogical reasoning: it is a kind of reasoning that two or two objects are the same in some attributes and infer that they are also the same in other attributes (this attribute has been owned by one analogical object, but not found in another analogical object).
What is analogical reasoning? Analogical reasoning is based on the fact that two types of objects are the same in a series of attributes, and knowing that one type of objects also has other attributes, it is concluded that the other type of objects also has the same other attributes.
The form is:
An object has properties a, b, c and d.
Objects have attributes a, b, c.
Therefore, object b also has attribute d.
The topic of analogical reasoning of civil servants is worthless, so you can choose C or D.
The reason for choosing C is that the two countries are different continents.
Option d is two constitutional monarchy countries.
In mathematics, what is deductive reasoning? Please give an example to illustrate the definition of deductive reasoning: from the general principle, a special conclusion is derived, which is called deductive reasoning. 1. Deductive reasoning is from general to special reasoning; 2. "Syllogism" is a general model of deductive reasoning; Including (1) major premise-known general principle; (2) Minor premise-the special situation studied; (3) Conclusion —— Judgment on special circumstances according to general principles. The basic format of syllogism M-P (M is P) (major premise) S-M-P (M is M) (minor premise) S-P (S is P) (conclusion) 3. Understand the basis of syllogism reasoning from the perspective of set: if all elements of set M have property p, for example, 1. "The image of function y=x2+x+ 1 is a parabola" is reduced to a complete syllogism. Solution: The image of a quadratic function is a parabola (major premise). The function y=x2+x+ 1 is a quadratic function (minor premise). So the image of function y=x2+x+ 1 is a parabola (conclusion). Example 2: given that lg2=m, calculate the solution of lg0.8: (65438)0)- major premise lg8 = lg23- minor premise lg8 = 3lg 2- conclusion LG (a/b) = LGA-LGB (a > 0, b & gt0)- major premise LG 0.8 = LG(8/ 10)- minor premise LG 0.8 = LG(8/ 10)- conclusion example 3, as shown in the figure; In the acute triangle ABC, AD⊥BC, BE⊥AC, D and E are all vertical feet. It is proved that the distance from the midpoint m of AB to D and E is equal. Solution: (1) Because the triangle with right angles is a right triangle, the major premise is △ABC, AD⊥BC, that is, ∠ ADB = 90-minor premise, so △ABD is a right triangle-Conclusion (2) Because the median line on the hypotenuse of the right triangle is half of the hypotenuse,-The major premise is that DM is the median line on the hypotenuse of the right triangle.
Deductive reasoning is divided into three steps.
Major premise, minor premise, conclusion
The major premise is the general principle (law), that is, the abstract result of generality and unity; Minor premise refers to individual objects, which is reasoning from general to individual, from which conclusions can be drawn.
If you want to give an example, is the concept unclear?
It's actually quite simple. Give a less elegant example.
Premise-big principle-1 The class is all boys.
Minor premise-individual objects-you are also in 1 class.
Conclusion-You are also a man.
That's it, O(∩_∩)O~
If you need help, you can contact us for detailed consultation on analogical reasoning exercises.
C
[Analysis] The size of a square is determined by the side length, and the size of a circle is determined by the radius. Therefore, item C is correct.
What is the analogy reasoning test? Hello, Chinese public education is at your service.
Analogical reasoning: given a group of related words, it is required to find a group of words with the closest or similar logical relationship from the alternative answers through observation and analysis.
Example: Screw: Nut
A. water cup: thermos? B. Threads: buttons
C. socket: plug? D. chopsticks: bowls
(Answer: C. Screws and nuts are a set of things that must be used together. The relationship between plug and socket in option C is the same as that between screw and nut. )
Please click to view more civil service exam preparation materials!
If in doubt, please consult the public education enterprises in China.