If we make a practical plan for the review of each course, then the improvement of our grades is just around the corner. There are long-term, medium-term and short-term review schedules. In the long run, it should be roughly in line with the teacher's arrangement, that is, the overall progress should follow the teacher.
As far as mathematics is concerned, the medium-term arrangement mainly revolves around several branches: function, triangle, sequence, inequality, analytic geometry and solid geometry. Among them, function (including inequality), sequence and analytic geometry are the most important. The first round of review should pay attention to the organic combination between branches, and the comprehensive degree should be determined according to your actual situation. Students in ordinary middle schools can temporarily avoid the problem of high comprehensive degree and master the basic content first.
Short-term arrangement is to make a feasible plan by chapter or week. Sometimes the plan can arrange what to do every day, and the task should be specific and clear. The plan should be combined with the teacher's recent arrangement, follow the teacher's rhythm, and focus on breaking through your own weak links (such as remembering forgotten formulas and mastering unfamiliar methods) after completing the homework assigned by the teacher. In the first round of review, we should master the basic concepts and methods to solve a class of problems.
Second, the key to the plan is to implement it-improve learning efficiency.
Everyone knows the meaning of "spring is the time of the year". September is a crucial period for the new senior three students to adapt to the fast-paced and intense study life in senior three.
"Double basics" are put in place. That is to master the basic concepts of each chapter, the solutions to common problems, and the corresponding skills. The reason why some students "understand it as soon as they hear it, understand it as soon as they see it, and make mistakes as soon as they do it" is that they are not in place in this respect. In class, we should not only think in sync with the teacher, but also try to work out the correct answer in sync with the teacher or faster than the teacher. It is far from enough to know, and it is far from enough to master knowledge and form ability. You should know that "what you get on paper is shallow, and you never know what to do."
Do your homework in a limited time. When you do your homework, you should set a time for yourself, "get into the state" like an exam, and follow the principle of easy before difficult. When you encounter problems, you should think carefully, but if you can't do it for a while, you should learn to "give up". Teachers will collectively comment on what they can't do or make many mistakes when correcting. Advocating "perfect score after doing" is to seriously correct the wrong questions. You might as well prepare a set of wrong questions, write down the reasons for the mistakes, review them later, and try not to make the same mistakes. Some students have no idea of time when doing their homework. They do problems while reading formulas, and even check the answers with each other. This kind of homework can't reflect the actual level. Once they take the exam, they are too arrogant, either slow or have many calculation errors. It should attract the attention of some students (especially those below average).
Reduce low-level mistakes. Low-level mistakes lead to "meeting without being right" or "being right without being complete", which is the main reason why some students can't get up in grades. Most of them are caused by psychological factors such as miscalculation and exam nervousness. These problems are easily covered up by the appearance of "carelessness". In fact, constant carelessness is a bad habit, and we must fully realize its harmfulness and try our best to overcome it.