Secondly, about comprehensive literature-I am a candidate from Jilin, and the total score of comprehensive literature is 300 points. The first volume of multiple-choice questions accounts for 140 points, and the second volume of written answers accounts for 160 points. That year, I got 248 points in the comprehensive examination of literature and got 136 points in the first volume, which is a wrong multiple-choice question in geography.
On the learning method of history, 1. To "read through" books-turn over more books and read them skillfully, which requires you to calm down and remember them carefully. In addition to the knowledge taught by the teacher in class and the text knowledge in the book, you should also be familiar with small materials and illustrations, so that you can take out a piece of content casually and immediately reflect which part of the book this knowledge is in. There is no trick to this "record", so you can only read more books by yourself. Because there are frequent monthly exams in the final stage of senior three, I will flip through books almost every month before the college entrance examination. Before the college entrance examination, I can say that I can't read books for at least 20 times. 2. After getting familiar with books, the next step is a process of understanding. Many people think that liberal arts is a rote learning process, but I don't think so! Although the basic knowledge of liberal arts is backrest, the questions on the test paper are not only about basic knowledge, but the answer is often to ask students what they understand. Therefore, when studying history, once the basic knowledge is laid, it will be promoted to understanding. The answer is also the idea of "time, place, background, reason, influence, significance, lesson, etc." . Basic knowledge lets you know that the first four points and the last four points are the real purpose of studying history, which is why history has become an important part of national education. Therefore, from now on, don't just do the questions, but think more about the above points when doing the questions. You will find more interesting things and your study will not be boring! 3. Expand your knowledge of questions-let yourself do two sets of papers every day (not much, but stick to it). Whether it's multiple-choice questions or answering questions, the knowledge points are the same, but the questions are different, which is easy to misunderstand, so you can be more confident by reading more. At first, I usually only do multiple-choice questions. When answering questions, I will write down the thinking of answering questions, and then compare the answers to see if there are any omissions and the writing of standard answers.
As for the learning method of politics, I can only say that I met a good teacher. She divided politics into three parts: materialism, methodology and dialectics. Each block is divided into several knowledge points, and each knowledge point has a good annotation. Simply put, it is to sort out the network of knowledge. All I have to do is remember these things. When I use them, I just need to take them out of the library. Furthermore, do more questions and ask the teacher if you don't understand. In addition, we should pay attention to political answers, not to say that when we meet a question, we will write it all, but it will disgust the marking teacher. So when we answer questions, we should first carefully examine the questions and ask which part of the theory you use to explain them. If there is no given range, we should write everything you know. Secondly, we should pay attention to the standard of answering questions. There are certain norms for answering political questions. Write down the knowledge points first, and then answer them in combination with the materials, which is the complete answering mode.
About geography, because my geography is also average, it generally looks like more than 70 points. Basically, I can't think of any good experience to introduce to you, so I'm sorry, geography can't help you.