Quantization weighting is indeed like this. The question is, is there any basis for your determination?

In my memory, there are two kinds of fixed rights, subjective and objective. Subjectively, there are: experts determine the right (that is, find an expert or do an investigation), and analytic hierarchy process (this is a little better, involving the consistency test of decision vectors and decision matrices, and posting websites is not easy to pass. I suggest you search the course of analytic hierarchy process, which is not difficult, as long as you can calculate the matrix. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) requires that your decision-making object is composed of multiple upper-level factors, such as traffic is people flow+traffic lights, people flow is the superposition of going to work+going to school, and risk your life to post a tutorial/view/cfe17a01b52af789ebc92d.html).

It is also very simple to determine the weight objectively. I often use the coefficient of variation method, the simplest method, the entropy method. You can also find cases online according to keywords. Objective empowerment requires you to have a lot of data.

Note that objectivity and subjectivity have their own advantages and disadvantages. Pay attention to analysis when writing a paper.

Your question is comprehensive evaluation. Many teaching materials of mathematical modeling specifically introduce comprehensive evaluation, but it is similar to the scope I explained above. You can also take a closer look at this textbook.