Theoretically speaking, if you have mastered all the real questions in the past 100%, or compressed them and mastered all the real questions in the past 20 years, then you can only deduct points on the current college entrance examination paper because of miscalculation or drawing wrong cards, and there is no possibility of not doing so. The difficulty of many college entrance examination questions has reached the semi-final level of Olympic Mathematics, which contains ideas and knowledge far beyond the scope of ordinary high schools.
So my suggestion is to do both real questions and simulation questions, but don't waste time on junk questions and questions that can't be tested in the college entrance examination. Typically, many students have asked me about the complex combination of four hearts and vectors in a triangle, or the abnormal range of solid geometry. If you are a candidate in Zhejiang, I can understand, but what is the significance of doing such a question for the candidates in the national examination paper? It's a complete waste of life, even if I spend this time memorizing some composition materials, I can get rid of it. For example, some simulation questions, filling in the blanks or the arrangement and combination of plural numbers are simply immoral. In addition to ancient times, when did the college entrance examination examine these two knowledge points in depth? Therefore, the college entrance examination questions must be done. The primary purpose is to understand the key points of the college entrance examination and skip the garbage questions directly.
For another example, many students have done a lot of simulation questions about "endpoint effect" this year, and naturally they regard this ordinary question as "endpoint effect". This is because the simulation questions are poisoned, and I don't know that the trend of the college entrance examination has changed. If we carefully sort out the real questions in recent years, we will find that derivative questions such as "endpoint effect" are less and less investigated.
Before the college entrance examination this year, many students asked me many questions about the magical changes of Zhejiang conic. I have been euphemistically saying that this Chinese language will not be tested. If I spend my time on other things, I won't even take the Zhejiang newspaper exam again this year. Why am I so sure? Because I have been doing real questions for years, the style and direction of the proposition are clear to me. As long as the questioner is out of breath, there will be no misjudgment. If you ask, did the questioner really smoke? If you smoke, you will smoke. Is the proposer more likely to be normal or convulsed? If you really want to be prepared for the convulsion of the proposer, at least Orsay must have the level of saving one, otherwise it will be no use.
The most important thing is to do simulation questions for the college entrance examination. Don't get it backwards. I think many students have got it backwards. Do you know what the college entrance examination questions are? Do you need to master all the knowledge points in depth? Obviously not. Although the college entrance examination has changed, the key points and inspection points are traceable. After practicing for a year, L'H?pital kept his mouth shut about Mercedes theorem, and the result was a pyramid. A few bricks in the Temple of Heaven can trip you. What is this comment?