The central schools, bureaus, primary schools and related primary schools in this area:
According to the requirements of the Work Points of Municipal Jinshui District Education and Sports Bureau in 20 15 years, we should expand the space for evaluation reform, delegate the authority to evaluate the academic level of Chinese, mathematics, English in grades 1 and 2 and Chinese, mathematics and English in grades 6, promote the consistency of "teaching-learning-evaluation" and the change of students' learning methods, and explore a diversified and personalized academic quality evaluation mechanism.
Requirements for evaluating the academic quality of Chinese, mathematics and English in grades one, two, three and four.
1. Closely focus on the subject curriculum standards and the Reference for Evaluation of Learning Content and Cognitive Level of Subject Curriculum (see attached table), and combine the actual learning and development of students, conscientiously implement the semester subject curriculum outline, give full play to the good experience of students' learning, teachers' teaching and moderate evaluation in the teaching process, strive to solve the core problems, continuously improve students' learning and development level, and better realize the consistency of teaching, learning and evaluation.
2. On the basis of the academic quality evaluation scheme of subject courses in the last semester of the 20 14-20 15 school year, we put more emphasis on school-based, diversified, personalized, continuous and easy-to-operate evaluation methods, pay more attention to the technical connection between evaluation data and later quality analysis, and closely combine the reality of students, resources, teachers and school culture to optimize the academic quality evaluation scheme of subject courses in this semester.
3. Before September 20th, all schools will upload the academic quality evaluation schemes for Grade One, Grade Two, Grade One, Grade Two, Grade Three and Grade Four of Chinese to FTP-Shanghai-Academic Quality Evaluation Scheme-"1 Chinese" or "Grade Two" or "1Mathematics" respectively.
4. On September 27th, all schools checked the FTP-Reception-Academic Quality Evaluation Program of Education Development Research Center-/kloc-level 0/language or level 2 language or/kloc-level 0/math or level 2 math or level 3 English or level 4 English folder to see if the evaluation passed. Those who failed should follow September 29th. Then upload it to the FTP-submission-academic quality evaluation scheme-"1 level Chinese" or "2-level Chinese" or "1level math" or "2-level math" or "3-level English" or "4-level English" folder of the Education Development Research Center until it is qualified.
5. Subject teaching and research staff (Chinese subject Liu Juan 60 1 16638, mathematics subject Yu Wenhui 60 1 16640, third grade English subject Shen Lingyun 60 1 16650, fourth grade English subject Pan.
Suggestions and requirements for the evaluation of academic quality of Chinese, mathematics, English and other subjects in the second and sixth grades
1. Closely focus on the subject curriculum standards, Reference for Evaluation of Learning Content and Cognitive Level of Subject Curriculum (see attached table) and school curriculum planning (image of graduates related to subject curriculum), and combine the learning and development reality of primary school graduates, conscientiously implement the semester subject curriculum outline, and carefully sort out and give full play to the good effects of students' learning, teachers' teaching and appropriate evaluation in the teaching process. In normal teaching, we should seriously solve the core problems in curriculum teaching, encourage every student to work hard to complete their studies, precipitate the image of graduates who embody the core values and thinking methods of the subject curriculum, and completely realize the consistency of teaching, learning and evaluation of curriculum education.
2. On the basis of carefully sorting out the evaluation results of the academic quality of primary school subject courses, we should pay more attention to the implementation of school-based, diversified, personalized, active and easy-to-operate evaluation methods, pay more attention to the technical docking of evaluation data and materials with later quality analysis, and pay more attention to evaluation methods and strategies and the evaluation plan for the sixth grade next semester (refer to the evaluation plan for the sixth grade subject courses in the 2014/2015 school year).
3. It is not recommended that school districts or schools jointly organize or use third-party paper-and-pencil exams; Do not advocate paper-and-pencil tests or evaluation activities that repeat the content of process evaluation; Do not advocate the mechanical rigid evaluation activities with one evaluation standard for the whole class; It is not recommended to give an evaluation result for students' course learning and development through traditional paper-and-pencil examination or single evaluation activity.
4. Before September 20th, all schools will upload the academic quality evaluation scheme for the sixth-grade Chinese, sixth-grade math and sixth-grade English graduates to the FTP-Handover-Academic Quality Evaluation Scheme-Sixth-grade Chinese or sixth-grade math or sixth-grade English folder of the Education Development Research Center in the name of "School+Subject".
5. On September 27th, all schools checked and passed the evaluation from the folder FTP- Receiving-Academic Quality Evaluation Scheme-Sixth Grade Chinese or Sixth Grade Mathematics or Sixth Grade English of Education Development Research Center. Those who fail to pass the evaluation, please modify them according to the opinions on September 29th, and then upload them to FTP- Handover-Academic Quality Evaluation Scheme-Education Development Research Center for Grade 6 Chinese or Grade 6 Mathematics.
6. Subject teachers and researchers (Chinese +0 1 16638, Mathematics Liu Minghui +0 16640, English Pan+01/6650) evaluate the schools according to the curriculum standards and the Learning Contents of Subject Courses.
Three, according to the spirit of this notice, the central schools organize their own schools to apply for academic quality evaluation, and implement the teaching-learning-evaluation agreement.
The central school should upload the approved academic quality evaluation scheme of subordinate schools to the corresponding folder by compressed package before September 27.
Attachment: 1 Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level in the first semester of primary school Chinese.
2. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level in the first semester of primary school mathematics.
3. Reference table for evaluation of semester learning content and cognitive level in Chinese class in grade two of primary school.
4. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level of mathematics in the second grade of primary school in the last semester
5. Reference table for the evaluation of English learning content and cognitive level in the third grade of primary school last semester.
6. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level in the last semester of the fourth grade English course in primary school
7. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level of the sixth grade of primary school Chinese in the last semester.
8. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level of the sixth grade mathematics curriculum in the last semester.
9. Reference table for the evaluation of learning content and cognitive level of the sixth grade English course in primary school last semester