The process of checking the national competition code of mathematical modeling usually includes the following steps:
Integrity check: first, check whether the code contains all parts of the model, such as problem analysis, symbol description, model establishment, solution process, result display, etc.
Correctness check: at this stage, it is necessary to carefully check the logic and results of the code to confirm whether the code correctly solves the problem. This may need to be discussed with other members of the team or tested according to the requirements of the topic.
Efficiency check: This stage needs to check the running speed of the code. In mathematical modeling competition, the running speed of code is very important. If the calculation time of a model is too long, it may not be completed in the limited time of the competition.
Readability check: At this stage, you need to check whether the code is easy to read and understand. In the mathematical modeling competition, the referee may need to read the codes of multiple teams. If a team's code is difficult to read, the referee may not be able to accurately evaluate the team's model.
Robustness check: This stage needs to check whether the code can handle abnormal situations. For example, if the code does not check the input data, it may cause the program to crash when the wrong data is input.
Documentation and comments check: This stage needs to check whether the documentation and comments of the code are sufficient. In the mathematical modeling competition, the referee not only needs to understand the code, but also needs to understand the thinking and logic behind the code. Therefore, adequate documentation and annotations are very important.
In practice, these steps may need to be adjusted according to the specific situation of the game. For example, if competitors provide special test data sets, the efficiency check and correctness check may need to be based on these test data sets.