Chinese and English can be learned in advance, read more, read more, improve their language expression ability, broaden their horizons and life experience. But we should also make reasonable arrangements according to our own economic conditions and children's time. You can learn Chinese and English words. You know more about ancient poetry than others, read more, have a sense of language, and naturally get high marks in the exam. For example, when learning English, students always ask why this word is used instead of that word. In fact, many times there is no reason, and the teacher can't answer. Everyone uses it this way, reading more articles and watching American dramas, without thinking, blurting it out. Writing a composition depends largely on reading. Even if you don't read too many huge articles, reciting 100 model essays is enough to get high marks in writing. I don't need to elaborate on this, everyone has experience. English teachers are required to recite texts for the same reason. They can't recite English articles. Basically, all the English compositions they write are translated by themselves, which is very interesting for foreign primary school students to read. Mathematics is deep, so you have time to exercise your thinking, master logical reasoning, and draw inferences from others to improve the difficulty. Mathematics mainly depends on rigorous logical analysis instead of rote memorization and repeated training, without "language sense"

Chinese and English depend on reading more books, so mathematics depends on doing more problems. Improve the agility, accuracy and complexity of their thinking by doing problems, thinking and summarizing problems. It is meaningless to understand only some mathematical concepts, but it is also necessary to understand, skillfully use and master these concepts. Many children who study mathematics in advance have not even reached the level of "understanding". For example, many kindergarten parents think that their children will add and subtract under the age of 100, and even recite the multiplication table, thinking that their children are smart. As a result, the teacher hit him in the face when he was a freshman. The teacher requires that the oral calculation of 100 should be completed completely and correctly within the specified time. Basically, no child can do it without several weeks of training. In this process, parents will be driven crazy, and children will be scolded and cried: "How are you wrong again?" "How so slow!" It's too simple. Five, seven, what's wrong? "... then parents will understand that the sweat and tears of" meeting "and" proficiency "and" mastery "are almost the same.

The law of learning is a gradual process. Personally, I don't believe in genius. As long as they are normal-born people, 99% of them should have a small intelligence level (temporarily ignoring external factors such as family and school). Letting a third-grade child learn the knowledge of grade five, six or even junior high school not only increases the child's learning burden, but also deprives the child of normal rest time. The blind compulsion of parents and the roar of failing to reach the goal make the whole learning process boring. Children get tired of studying easily. More importantly, learning ahead of time makes children lack in-depth thinking and exploration of knowledge. This kind of learning is inefficient and worthless. A thorough understanding of textbooks is more important than anything else. Many parents think that textbooks are simple, and my children are smart and need more extracurricular knowledge. Of course, I have no objection to children learning more extracurricular knowledge, but only if they really understand textbooks. Whether the definition of each mathematical concept is understood, whether each extracurricular Chinese article is thoroughly analyzed, and how many knowledge points each English unit contains are clear. If the college entrance examination is a tree, then the textbook is the root.

If you study the NMET carefully, you will find that no matter how difficult the questions are, they will change on the basis of textbook knowledge, but the investigation of knowledge is more systematic. Please believe that the textbooks for children's schools are the most suitable for students to learn, which have been studied and compiled by countless experts repeatedly, and no other reading materials can replace its position. When it comes to the content of junior high school, it can only be regarded as a little knowledge. Because after all, there is not much time to brush his questions. But it is still very helpful to the academic performance in class. This semester, I got full marks in Math English. For example, this semester's credits, factorization, circles, equations. I learned all this when I was studying in junior high school. I learned multiplication and multiplication in my second grade. Equation also learned fractional equation. Although he can't cope with the junior high school exam now, he can cope with the primary school exam. In short, English and mathematics must be studied in advance, including physics and chemistry. China people can't put it down. Besides reading more books, you should also tell him more historical stories, politics, military affairs and economy. In addition, the answering skills of reading comprehension are specially trained. In this way, less points can be deducted.