Some young people often regard bourgeois experts and scholars as role models, thinking that as long as they are divorced from politics and immersed in business, they can become famous and become a family through personal struggle. This is actually a road that is only good. Let youth shine! The problem with this article is that it does not emphasize the direction of being both red and expert, and does not point out the importance of first establishing the proletarian world outlook and first carrying out ideological revolution. Instead, it lists the achievements of many bourgeois scientists and writers in the old society as an encouragement to young people to become talents at an early date? Finished product? For example, this can not help these young people to be vague about being red and specialized, which will bring them negative effects. I think we should have a correct view of this problem.
We don't deny that celebrities in history have played a certain role in the development of cultural science. However, we must analyze and criticize these people from the viewpoint of class and historical materialism. For example, Da in the Renaissance? Finch, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Bacon and others represented the thoughts of the revolutionary class and the emerging bourgeoisie at that time, adapted to the needs of the development of European production at that time, and thus created modern natural science. However, the age and class they lived in also caused many limitations. Give some examples of celebrities. In his later years, Newton buried himself in explaining the Bible and the Revelation of John. God's first driving force? As part of his solar system theory. Is this just because of him? Old and confused? Not because of his idealistic world outlook, not because of class prejudice? The reactionary Leibniz pyrene? It says on the list? Dostoevsky's morbid religious fanaticism is also in his twenties? Create? Get out. These are all caused by the limitations of their class. Similarly, the reactionary views of a series of bourgeois scientists from Turin and Mach to modern times are also due to the mistakes of their fundamental positions.
It stands to reason that these historical facts should make us understand how important the advanced world outlook is to the progress of culture, science and technology, and how important the practice of class struggle and production struggle is to theoretical research. However, if we don't use the weapon of class analysis, don't talk about the revolutionary requirements of the times, and just focus on? The first book of poetry? 、? The first masterpiece? Above, think this is the only one? The glory of youth? So, is this related to Ding Ling? A book doctrine? What is the difference? Ding Ling's magic weapon is:? If you publish a book, no one can beat it. . From this point of view, did she? Diligence? I have written many books successfully. What book? The first book is Monk, followed by Diary of Ms. Sha Fei and so on? Personality freedom? 、? Human touch? Literary rubbish, until the dark, filthy and hysterical "When I was in the village" and a series of strange articles that attacked the party crazily.
Among young people, there are of course Rightists like Liu Shaotang and Lin Xiling in 1957? Teenagers, twenties? When did you write it? A blockbuster? Works and articles, but they use it as capital, reaching out to the party and attacking socialism. What achievements have they made? Equipment? !
These living facts tell us that in today's society with class struggle, under the situation that the bourgeoisie is fiercely competing for young people, if we young people unconsciously carry out ideological transformation and do not establish a correct world outlook, we will become successors of the proletarian revolution, and we will become successors of the bourgeoisie and revisionism. Such people, no matter how diligent and good their business is, are not good for the people.
There are such people among the young scientific and technological personnel around me. He's not physical, is he? Diligence? However, I always have a personal calculation in my heart, just want to get ahead. Paper 1
Out, famous all over the country? . He is very picky about his work. He doesn't do unknown things; ? Ordinary? Repeated experimental work, he won't do it; He won't do a job whose remuneration is not to his liking. What are his principles? The name is greed? As for whether these works are needed by the party's cause or by building and defending the socialist cause, he dare not even think about it. He has an ulterior personal fame and fortune in his heart, longing for the special treatment of fame, status, food, clothing and housing. Smart? If you spend all your energy on these things, how can you concentrate on scientific research? There are even individuals who steal the fruits of others' labor, take all the credit for themselves and seek personal fame and fortune. Isn't this an out-and-out bourgeois idea?
The purpose of our revolutionary intellectuals to learn and master all science and technology can only be to serve the people and socialism wholeheartedly, not to serve individuals or do anything. Public-private partnership? , the so-called both for individuals and for the people. The idea of serving the people is incompatible with the idea of individualism. Anyone with individualism and fame and fortune is always insatiable and reaches out to the party and the people. When their selfish desires are not satisfied, they gradually deviate from the people politically, although they usually talk about how beautiful they are. Contribute to the people? Things like ah will eventually degenerate into bourgeois yes-men who are politically opposed to the interests of the people.
Isn't the direction pointed out by the commentary exactly to guide young people to develop on this dangerous road? Now, the bourgeoisie sees that it is extremely difficult for them to become capitalists again, open factories and run companies. But ideologically, especially in some corners of science, technology and culture, there is still their market. So they use their influence and capital in this respect to corrode and compete for young people, and this kind of corrosion and competition is often sold to us with a layer of sugar coating and beautiful signs. This deserves our youth's vigilance.
Our revolutionary cause needs a red professional army composed of proletarian intellectuals. There will be tens of millions of people in this team, and no one is impossible. They should not only arm their minds with the most advanced proletarian ideas, but also have the heart to serve the broadest revolutionary people wholeheartedly and master the most advanced scientific and cultural knowledge in human history; Not only proficient in theory, but also good at practice; Can not only engage in mental labor, but also engage in manual labor. This is a new generation of proletariat, not the bourgeoisie in history? Celebrity? Can be compared. In my opinion, what we young people want to be is such a tool, not a tool of bourgeois scientists and writers. Taking the name of bourgeois scientists and writers as the object of yearning is nothing more than? The entanglement of vulgar and trivial personal desires? . Bourgeois intellectuals? Habitual point of view? , in the end? Enough to hinder the growth of new characters? . I have personal experience in this regard.
I am a worker's child. I was only seven years old in the year of liberation. The party saved us from suffering and let me wear a red scarf to school. But I think I came from a good family and grew up under the five-star red flag. Most of my friends and relatives are party member and revolutionary cadres. It seems that I have nothing. Exploiting class thought? I don't need it? Remodeling? Just how long? Further study? Do it.
I like math since I was a child. For a time, I spent almost all my time exploiting the loopholes in mathematics and solving difficult problems. At this time, some bourgeois teachers often sell me the names of western mathematicians. How charming gauss is, how arrogant riemann is, and so on. In this way, the idea of fame and fortune gradually influenced my childish mind. After winning the math contest, what do you think you are? Different? Yes Someone praised me? A prodigy? I feel a little, too, you know? Amazing? Yes
I have such a special feeling that the revolutionary elders are very uneasy. They have warned me many times? Never walk into a dead end of complacency! ? I began to feel that something was wrong with me, but what was wrong? I don't know. 1957 The anti-rightist struggle sounded the alarm for me, and Chairman Mao's "On Correctly Handling Contradictions among the People" showed me the direction. I'm just thinking, okay? What is a maker? ? Later, I went to college and went to the factory to participate in labor for nearly a year. I saw with my own eyes that the working class never cared about the excellent quality of personal reputation, status and remuneration when completing national tasks. I saw with my own eyes that the working class regarded the cultural and scientific revolution as a collective undertaking. In the past, bourgeois scholars always put? Knowledge? Like capital, it is regarded as private property, and I only saw it clearly when I was working in a factory. I was actually influenced by this idea. I am a working-class child, but after learning culture, how can I think differently from the working class? How can you think you are? Superior? And then what? No, I can't forget my roots.
I deeply realize that it is under the care of the Party, the League organizations and the revolutionary predecessors that I have avoided going astray and embarked on a red and professional road. Revolutionary elder? According to which? Experience and? Habitual point of view? , is the principle of red and expert, is Mao Zedong Thought, is by no means like "let youth shine! As mentioned in the article,? Adults do not need to intervene according to their own experience, nor do they need to promote their own experience? Excuse me, is it red and expert experience? Don't need universal promotion? Really? Is it Mao Zedong Thought? Don't need universal promotion? Really? According to my own personal experience, without the care and training of the party and revolutionary predecessors (or? Interference? ), then our generation of young people will not be able to take revolutionary classes.
In our time, corrupted by the bourgeois world outlook? Youth? It is pale and dim, and has no future. Only the youth of the proletarian revolution can shine forever, sparking generate.