There will be less cheating in the monthly exam than in the weekly exam, but the weekly exam is purely a water teacher who does not supervise and arrange the seating arrangement of single table seats, just like usual classes.
Do you think this kind of exam is useful for most students in ordinary middle schools? Therefore, according to the broken-line statistical chart of class ranking, the summary of dominant knowledge points and the trend chart of test scores beyond the proportion of class size, as long as it is not a big exam, it is basically useless and has no reference value at all.
Moreover, on the platform of intimate wisdom, our school cooperates and every student has to subscribe. I have never tried to resist before, but it is said that all the students who raised objections were called to talk, and it seems that they were all scolded, and then everyone decided.
Personally, I don't think there is anything new in selecting materials in the question bank. It is nothing more than pulling out some problems from the outside, such as textbook help, because textbook help also selects many local simulation questions, and occasionally there will be cases of intimate wisdom colliding with questions (of course, because I basically don't use it much, I can only say that it is occasional).
The number of test papers will change slightly according to the number of questions each time, but generally it is less than 5 papers (including the answer about 10 page). Some questions are equipped with QR codes. After scanning the QR code, you can see some teachers explaining it to you. After watching the video for about 5 times, I feel that the teacher's level is average and the equipment in the whole shooting environment is not particularly good. There are chicken soup phrases in the footer (I have seen them repeated). The paper looks ok.