1) About time "When should I start reviewing math?" It is a question that many people have thought about or are thinking about. In fact, when reviewing, the sooner the better. This will give you enough time to review several times and deepen your understanding of the problem. Many people worry that if they review math too early, they will forget all the knowledge points and formulas and fail in the exam. Therefore, they didn't formally review mathematics until September. Now the trend of proposition is more and more to examine the understanding ability and develop the application ability, so the test questions are no longer based on the backrest formula, which requires a considerable understanding of the knowledge points and formulas, which is definitely not something that can be done simply by browsing textbooks. So I suggest you start from around May, and start the second round of review in September (this schedule is most suitable for students who have won the top prize), so that you can read it at least three times before the exam. If you study hard every time, then every review will give you a deeper understanding of the knowledge points, and you will naturally be able to solve the problems with ease.

(2) The choice of books is very important. I don't want to say more here. I suggest that the exam analysis shall prevail. Some candidates seem to have not approved the review guide of Chu Student Affairs Office and the reference book of Political Affairs Office. When who is who, everyone is talking about who is good and who is bad, but what is certain is that the reference books in the Student Affairs Office are very good! There are many so-called postgraduate entrance examination experts in the market now. They run classes and produce math books, so there is no complete consensus on whose book is the best. The books I used for this postgraduate entrance examination are the books written by Teacher Liu and the counseling materials prepared by the College Students Department of the Ministry of Education. The reasons for choosing these two books are as follows: First, the system is reasonable, closely linked to the outline, and there is no over-class phenomenon. Second, the thickness is moderate. Review for postgraduate entrance examination is a great test of people's confidence and patience. Holding a book that is too thick, I feel I don't know when I can finish it. It's so depressing. Candidates who have attended Mr. Liu's class should know that Mr. Liu has always stressed the need to repeatedly scrutinize knowledge points and popular test sites, and has a deep understanding of the types of topics. I suggest you take a look at "Review of Advanced Mathematics Exam" written by Liu Tan and Yu. This book is well written, and it will certainly be of great help to the future postgraduate review.

(3) The problem of remedial classes was mentioned before the postgraduate entrance examination, but I think it is necessary for me to talk about the remedial classes of mathematics. After attending the remedial class, you need to put your practice and energy into analysis, understanding and summary under the guidance of the teacher. This requires everyone to spend some time, but those formulas and theorems that they understand are easy to remember, especially the number of lines and probability, which need everyone's understanding and memory. So everyone must read the book several times. Moreover, to participate in the postgraduate remedial classes, we should hold the attitude of learning theory and helping to understand, but we can't expect teachers to press the questions. Teacher Liu's remedial class has one of the biggest characteristics, "learning the law!" This is also my biggest gain in Teacher Liu's class. I think Mr. Liu is "teaching people to fish" and guiding everyone to review for the postgraduate entrance examination in the right way!

(4) It is important for everyone to read books on simulation questions, but it is a bit boring to always read books without doing the questions, especially in courses like mathematics, which lack the consciousness of doing the questions. After reading the theoretical data of mathematics, I did a lot of problems, about 60 sets. In a word, I did many sets of simulation questions, and I had a well-thought-out plan before I entered the examination room. In fact, exams are all extensions or deformations of questions, and it is of great benefit to do the questions well.