Haitian Postgraduate Entrance Examination: Yes, one of the best differences lies in the scope of examination questions. You can learn from this classmate's learning style: \ x0d \ Math1:135 \ x0d \ Among all the achievements, mathematics is the most incredible one for me. Because I have never scored so high in all the real questions. \x0d\ I mainly read textbooks in spring. It is necessary to read the textbook, but I don't need to read it too carefully (this is also where I didn't do well, I spent a long time reading the textbook). Some important theorems in textbooks, such as the mean value theorem, labeling theorem, etc., are best copied down in a proven book and read at the last stage. Then some typical questions can also be written down. It's easy to forget the first time you read the textbook, but the main purpose of the first time is to make a preliminary memory of the knowledge. Just pick a few exercises after class. You don't have to do them carefully. The problem is mainly the second round. \x0d\ Many people say that it is useless to make up lessons in math, but I personally think it is very useful. It is quite necessary to take a class in advanced mathematics. I took the intensive class of Haitian postgraduate entrance examination, and then read the review guide, which was very effective. The method in the review guide is very good, but I still can't understand it myself. It would be much better to have classes. Linear algebra and probability theory are relatively simple, and there are not so many methods. But the probability part of 20 10 mathematics 1 is still very difficult, so we should pay attention to it. As for linear algebra, just look at Li Yongle's lectures on linear algebra. It's certainly better if you have the conditions to attend classes. After reading this book thoroughly, there is basically no problem in the linear generation part of postgraduate mathematics, but I still have problems with the linear generation multiple-choice questions this year! In the probability part, I read a review book. Actually, any book will do. The key is to be clear in logic. In the part of mathematical statistics, we should remember all kinds of relationships clearly and then deduce more by ourselves. Basically, it's nothing serious. \x0d\ The real problem of mathematics is also very important, so we must do it seriously within ten years. Personally, it seems that the problem of more than 90 years is far from the present, and it is also very difficult. In addition, the time is a little too late, so basically they haven't done it. The real questions must be done in sets, because many people can't adapt when the questions change, so it is good to do more sets before. As for the \x0d\ simulation questions, it seems that everyone recommended Li Yongle's 400 questions, but I didn't do it myself because I didn't have time. If I have time, it will be very useful. After all, I have a good reputation for so many years. And Li Yongle's "660 Questions", which is also very good. It's basically blind spots, and it's hard for us to notice. I remember on the forum, someone said that if you finish 660 twice, you can kill it by filling in the blanks, but I didn't finish it because of time. In the final analysis, it is because I spend too much time reading textbooks. \x0d\ Many people say that math needs sea tactics, but obviously I don't. I am still very satisfied with the final result, so I personally think that the key is to sum up the methods carefully when reading and doing the questions, rather than simply doing the questions. —— Qingdao Zhang Qi