Mathematics for postgraduate entrance examination is mostly basic and intermediate questions, and difficult and partial questions only account for about 20%. However, some students just like to do difficult problems and ignore the basic knowledge points, often because of small losses. It takes a lot of time and energy to do difficult problems when the foundation is not firm. Therefore, we must proceed from our own situation and reality, lay a solid foundation and eat thoroughly, so that problems can be solved.
Myth 2: Ignore basic concepts, formulas and theorems.
Many students are not sure about concepts, formulas and theorems, so they look up books when they do problems. In the long run, they get less. Mathematical logic is strong, and concepts, formulas and theorems are closely related, so we must master them.
In the process of reviewing at ordinary times, try to remember as much as possible on the basis of understanding, and don't just rely on turning over textbooks to solve problems. If you lose points because these basic knowledge points are not firmly mastered, it is really not cost-effective.
Myth 3: poor autonomy and lack of independent thinking ability.
Some students have poor learning initiative. After enrolling in the remedial class, I just attend classes, and I don't preview before class, and I don't consolidate after class. The next time I meet a teacher's topic, I still can't start. Learning is too passive, and it is more difficult to get good grades. No matter whether you report to class or not, you should take the initiative to study and think and improve your ability.
Myth 4: Simple imitation, no understanding.
Some students are opportunistic because of tight review time or insufficient review. Simply imitate the existing methods and skills, the topic changes slightly, and there is nothing to do.
In fact, the methods and skills are based on the in-depth understanding of basic knowledge points, and have their premise and scope of application.
Blind imitation with half the effort is not desirable. When reviewing, you must be down-to-earth, know the ins and outs of each method and skill, and form your own set of problem-solving theories.
Myth 5: just look at the questions and don't practice.
Mathematics is a rigorous subject, and there is no room for any mistakes. Before the overall knowledge framework is established, we often can't grasp the key and difficult points when reviewing repeatedly. Only by practicing regularly and standardizing the steps of answering questions can we improve our proficiency in solving problems and calculating.
The three-hour exam itself is a test of calculation ability and problem-solving speed, and the grading is gradual. How to score in the examination room must be explored by yourself.
Myth 6: Blind pursuit of sea tactics.
Mathematics can't be separated from doing problems, but it doesn't mean doing sea tactics. Mathematics requires improving one's problem-solving ability by doing problems. In the review process, doing exercises can broaden our thinking and deepen our understanding of the connotation and extension of knowledge points.
By doing problems, constantly summing up and summarizing, we should also be flexible and changeable, so as to draw inferences from others to cope with changes. Only in this way can we take the battle calmly and win the battle.
What are the misunderstandings in the review stage of basic mathematics for postgraduate entrance examination? Bian Xiao stops here. More questions about admission, registration time, result inquiry, registration fee, admission, printing time of entrance examination admission ticket will be updated in time. I hope all candidates can be admitted to their ideal institutions. Everyone should master the skills of preparing for the exam.