Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - How much is the mathematics for logistics management postgraduate entrance examination? Is it more difficult than accounting mathematics? I am going to be a sophomore. Can I review calculus now?
How much is the mathematics for logistics management postgraduate entrance examination? Is it more difficult than accounting mathematics? I am going to be a sophomore. Can I review calculus now?
1. Generally speaking, all management classes count to three and four.

2. Almost

It is ok to prepare calculus now.

Process! ! !

Next semester of junior year

1: recite English words (you can consider using Spark if you have a good foundation, and you can buy last year's outline and recite it for more than 20 times if you have a poor foundation! )

2. Get real English questions over the years and read 4-6 articles a week, not much (the exam worm is the best, just a little, but classic).

3. If you want to get high marks in mathematics, I suggest you push the theorems in two advanced mathematics books of Tongji Edition, and then do the interesting questions later. Of course, this is an extremely boring process, but you will feel the power of this process later.

summer vacation

I suggest you take a summer math tutorial class! (If the above three items are done well, the remedial class is an understanding process of the postgraduate entrance examination questions; If you can't do the above three, it is even more necessary. As for summer politics, I am strongly opposed to it. You can look at your situation in English.

Next semester

1: Math spent three months reading Li Yongle's review book, followed by real questions or 400 questions.

2. Political recommendation of Ren Rufen's counseling book, with clear test sites.

3. I insist on doing the real English questions (I have done the real questions for no less than 5 times), and then the simulation questions. It is recommended to use the test bug. I strongly recommend that you recite an English composition (very familiar, very familiar) and recite it directly without taking the exam.

Choose books! ! !

It should be said that choosing a good review reference book means that the postgraduate entrance examination has a successful start. First of all, let me talk about the three basic principles of choosing exam review books (which also apply to politics and English)

65438+

2. Try to choose the review materials prepared by famous teachers. As far as I know, there are Bi Jinxian (Peking University), Zhang Jinxin (National People's Congress) in English, and New Oriental. In mathematics, Hu Jinde (Tsinghua), (Central Finance), (Peking University) and Cai Tunlin (Zhejiang University), and in politics, Chen.

3. The political syllabus changes a lot every year, so you should wait at least half a month (usually July) after the syllabus comes out before you consider buying the latest counseling materials (the new exam syllabus must prevail); English and mathematics should be said to change little every year, so you can choose the review materials of previous candidates (especially mathematics, I personally think that if you can use the information of a former master, then his summary and induction in the book will be very helpful to you);

First of all, talk about math review and reading test papers. We should have a main book to review mathematics, which should be used all the time and be complete. At present, two popular versions on the market are Wendeng Chen's Guide to Mathematics Review and Fan Peihua, Yuan Yintang and Li Yongle's Encyclopedia of Mathematics Review. It should be said that these two books have their own merits, but in recent years, especially from the examination situation in 2005 and 2006, the encyclopedia has provided guidance for the examination. This book pays more attention to the foundation and the improvement of ability on this basis, which is in the same strain as the questions of the postgraduate entrance examination, because the questions of the postgraduate entrance examination are basically the deformation of the basic questions, and the master lies in its ability to transform a complex mathematical problem into two or three simple questions, which is the value of the book. Wendeng Chen's book puts too much emphasis on skills, so it is not easy to improve everyone's ability.

In fact, I personally recommend a handout on mathematics counseling for postgraduate entrance examination (science and engineering). The authors Jolin Tsai Hu Jinde are all first-class masters. I can compare them with each other, and I will analyze them later! ! !

Emphasis: The current proposition trend requires solid basic skills, skillful problem solving and adaptability to questions, and Chen's book is gradually unsuitable for this kind of examination.

If you must choose numbers, it is generally recognized that Chen's probability linearity is the weak link (but people call it "the king of line generation"). Some people think that Chen's advanced mathematics is the essence. Personally, I think he used too many impractical skills in advanced mathematics, and the high number part exceeded the outline, focusing on the comparison and proof of definite integral, the application of double integral and the series part. Moreover, Chen's proof column simply emphasizes skills and is most suitable for everyone to read. Teacher Chen's good and accurate exercise book is good for advanced mathematics, which I agree with the teacher.

The most crucial point is that Mr. Chen didn't take part in the postgraduate entrance examination proposition, because he was famous for his early tutoring, and there is still a big gap between Hu Jinde and Cai Tunlin in terms of experience and tutoring level, because his tutoring behind him is in school and a few years later than Chen in society. It's called preconceptions.

2. If there is any dispute about reviewing reference books, the best simulation test is "400 Classic Simulation Questions" (published by National School of Administration Press) by Dr. Zhao and Yuan Yintang of Li Yongle (both students of Peking University Department of Mathematics). This 10 set of simulated test questions basically summarizes the latest test questions, and the prediction of the test questions in that year is also relatively accurate. The suggested score was bought by students in senior high school for a work. However, the disadvantage of this book is that it is sometimes too difficult, and it is easy to hit everyone's confidence (my grades are basically concentrated between 1 10- 120), but the topics are all the latest examples, which greatly improves the individual's ability, so I suggest to review them before using them, which is easy to hit personal confidence too early, so as to find out my weak links in time. Another good simulation test was written by Dongfang Longfei last year. In 2006, the subject was mainly written by Hu Jinde, Cai Tunlin, Yu Shu and Chen Zhong. (The topics are arranged by these teachers and contributed by Teacher Yu). The characteristic of this set of questions is that it is slightly more difficult than that of the previous year (not as difficult as 400 questions), and it can be used as a tool to test your true level; In addition, the simulated test questions edited by Wendeng Chen are well-known, but their personal feelings are average. The questions seem to continue the habit of Mr. Chen Chaogang, so they are not recommended to everyone.

3. The final sprint book: Generally speaking, every year, by the end of 1 1, all famous scholars have to publish a book for the final sprint. Personally, there is no need to buy it, because mathematics focuses on the foundation, which is basically impossible to get through surprise; If you must buy "sprint 135" edited by Li Yongle, (the math problem in 2006 is not difficult, but it is very strange, especially the probability problem, which is actually the basic concept of the exam, but the exam method is really strange, like the first big probability problem of Math 3 and Math 4, finding the distribution function of Y, which is simple, but it contains a profound theorem in number theory: If you don't understand what I'm saying, your probability foundation is really poor, but personally, I think this book is still useful for dealing with general routine problems, and the score is very good. On the contrary, in terms of basic training and adaptability, it highlights that our classmates' basic skills are not too hard, and the average score is not very good. In terms of probability, the variance is very large, which is even more proof. Mathematics is the subject with the most scores. English politics is only 20 points, while mathematics may get more than 50-80 points.