So whenever I hear someone say, "Did your math teacher teach you that?" I really want to add: "Yes, my math teacher taught me, so what?" Thanks to this teacher, her teaching level is as fluent as her slogan in physical education class, otherwise I wouldn't have the courage to say this. Now, she can barely be regarded as a "slash youth"
In addition to her, our school also has a proper "slash middle-aged" who mainly teaches mathematics and works as a part-time music teacher, shopkeeper and garbage cleaner. However, he is not so capable. He doesn't teach math well and sings out of tune. I became a music teacher only because I can play the piano.
As far as his best job is concerned, he should be the owner of a grocery store, selling snacks in a small room at the corner of the stairs. After class, the students surrounded the small room on the third floor outside the room, and he was very busy. After eating snacks, students will throw bottles, cans and paper bags into the garbage, and then clear them out for sale when he changes shifts. I thought he was subsidizing the family, but later I learned that he was not short of money.
When he teaches us, he always tells us that he will retire after this session. He had been teaching mathematics before I went to college. In the early years, the canteen was ordered to close because of the school rectification, and the garbage dump was also cleaned by others. In the end, he "retired" for molesting students. I really want to ask, how did he become a teacher
Not only he, but also some teachers can't let people see what a teacher should look like.
I clearly remember that on the last day of summer vacation in Grade Three, I saw a woman pointing at an old man and swearing because the old man's bike scratched her newly bought jeans. The old man kept bowing down to apologize, and she insisted on asking for compensation. Fortunately, on the second day of school, this woman appeared in our class and was our head teacher. After a long time, I can't accept her in my heart.
Another teacher I still can't accept is the English teacher in Grade Three. Once, a classmate fell asleep in class. After the teacher woke him up, he swore a few words. The teacher picked up his whole stack of books and threw them out of the window because his classmates talked back. Our class is on the fourth floor, and it is estimated that the pile of books will be broken when they fly down.
Of course, once after school, he was in class, and we met some questions we didn't understand and wanted to ask him. When we entered the office, we saw him shut down a pornographic website in a hurry. Normal physiological needs are understandable, but it is a bit unreasonable for teachers to satisfy their selfish desires with office computers. In the final analysis, the quality of teachers is not enough.
Teachers' quality has a great influence on students, and it is designated as a compulsory subject in the teacher qualification examination. In my class, there are more than 1400 students in grade one, but in grade three, there are less than 800 students, and nearly half of them drop out of school.
Partly because of family economic problems, but after all, education is compulsory and many families can't afford it. As far as I know, many students are tired of learning or feel disrespected at school because they don't like a teacher, which eventually leads to dropping out.
Some people say that there was no need to take the teacher qualification exam before, and many teachers passed the exam to take up their posts or replace them, so some teachers were not high enough. Moreover, even if textual research is needed, quality can be faked in written test and interview, and teaching ability can't run away.
Indeed, many teachers have no choice in teaching ability and subject knowledge. But we all know that a clever woman can't cook without rice, and the conditions are not enough. The second day of junior high school followed the physics teacher to draw the circuit diagram for a semester, but I still don't know what the circuit is.
I can't help it. This thing can only be used once. If it burns out, it's broken. The school doesn't have that much money to cover this consumption, so it can only rely on the imagination on paper.
But what I can't understand is why the school has the money to build a new giant LED screen and a new student dormitory (our school is a non-boarding school), but it has no money to buy new books. There are more than 3,000 people in the three grades, but there is only one small library, which is open on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It's full of books that have been eaten almost by rats. This shows that education and teaching resources are scarce, and it is no wonder that some teachers complain about the poor teaching conditions.
But some teachers are too lazy to use even if you give them enough resources. Take physical education class as an example. Our physical education class will never be taken seriously. After the teacher reads the password, everyone can go back to study after warming up.
Near the senior high school entrance examination, the physical education exam came first, and the teacher dragged us out to practice like chicken blood. It was the first time I entered the sports equipment room, and all the equipment was piled up in a small room at random. We just need to move out the solid balls needed for the exam, and the rest will remain in the dust.
I also met a chemistry teacher, who obviously had materials, but never did experiments in class, so she put on ppt and read it from beginning to end. Under his leadership, I have been seriously copying the chemical reaction process for a whole year. What impressed me most was manganese dioxide, because it was a catalyst for many reactions.
I really want to know how this teacher recruited. Maybe he also met a noble person like manganese dioxide.
In fact, the school basically doesn't care about how to attend classes, so some teachers are too lazy to change. After all, after copying the reaction, most of the questions will still be written. As long as the enrollment rate is high, other things can be put on show when the leaders come to check. On the contrary, many schools have resorted to unscrupulous means to improve the enrollment rate.
I have heard of such a thing. A teacher asked students to sign a contract and let them put their high school (ranked at the bottom of the local school) at the forefront when filling in their volunteers for the senior high school entrance examination, so that several students scored above the key line but could not go to a better school.
When I first heard this, my first reaction was, why is that student so stupid? Isn't it necessary to fill in your volunteers according to your actual situation? But when I think about it later, in fact, sometimes in the hearts of some students, the teacher's words are the truth. If the teacher can think more about him and give him some correct suggestions, maybe what happened later will not happen.
That year, we divided the arts and sciences and handed in the volunteer forms. More than 60% students chose art. The headmaster quickly asked the teachers in each class to hold a class meeting, and analyzed a lot of reasons for us, telling us that it is easier to enter the university by applying for science. A teacher said a meaningful sentence: "You should be considerate of the principal, and he is also for the enrollment rate of the school." The next day, many people chose to volunteer again, and 70% of the students chose science. I don't know how many people were admitted to their favorite schools later, and I don't know if anyone regretted listening to the teacher's advice.
"So you didn't do well, blame the teacher? 」
This is the fourth sharing in 20 17.