Content of this article:
① Logical difficulties
(2) How many points should be set for logic?
③ Logical annual review planning
(4) Manage the comprehensive answer sequence.
⑤ Matters needing attention in logic are that you need to have an understanding of logic, know what to test, and examine the key points and directions.
The full score of logic is 60, and logic is divided into three parts: formal logic, argumentation reasoning and analytical reasoning. Examine our understanding, analysis, judgment and synthesis of information, and the corresponding logical thinking abilities such as reasoning, argumentation, comparison and evaluation, without examining the professional knowledge of logic. The content of the test questions involves many fields such as nature, society and humanities, but it does not examine the professional knowledge in related fields.
Through the analysis of real questions over the years, we can see its key investigation direction:
① Statistics of formal logic test sites in recent 10 years.
formal logic
Situational logic
Suppose the proposition has a large number of test questions every year, with at least 3 questions and at most 1 1- 12 questions.
② Inference statistics of argumentative papers in test sites in recent 10 years.
Weakening questions are tested every year, with at least 1 questions, and there are many support, hypothesis and explanation questions.
Debate reasoning
(3) analyzing the real problems of reasoning
Nearly 10 years zhenti test center
Starting from 20 13, the proportion of matching questions is getting higher and higher, so we must pay attention to it ~
What is the target score of Q2?
After we know the key points of Mapcc, the second step is to give logic a target score. Only when you have a goal can you work hard ~
The logic of MPACC must be simple and easy to learn, and it is best for students who take an examination of famous schools to aim at full marks. Let's take a look at the summary of the retest line of self-marking colleges in 2020. China Renmin University, Accounting, Management 120+, Agricultural University 135, Zhejiang University 160+, Tongji University 90+.
2020 self-marking retest score line
This is just a score that enters the retest score line. If you want to be finally admitted, you must improve this score. Taking the MPAcc re-examination list of Shanghai Jiaotong University in 2020 as an example, we can see that the scores of comprehensive management are between 153- 167, and English is 78-89(PS: these scores are simply too scary, they are all great gods ~).
In order to achieve the above score, our logic should not deduct too many points, but try to get high scores, so how many points should we get in the course of comprehensive logic? You can use the following scores as a reference. For MPAcc colleges, the logical goal is set at 50 points. For prestigious schools, the target score of 54+ is the most appropriate. You can even aim for full marks.
Q3: Logical Annual Review Plan
After knowing what a logic test is and defining our logic score, the third step is to charge like logic! ! ! ! Here is a review plan for the whole year, which can be used as your reference for review.
Early (1-June)
formal logic
1, familiar with all the knowledge points and reasoning rules of formal logic.
2. Reasoning the familiar rules repeatedly in the form of letters to a very familiar level? (I sorted out the necessary formulas of formal logic and summarized doc. You can trust me privately if you need it ~)
For example, "If a formula is used"
1) if p is q, p, so q.
2)(2) If P is Q, it is not Q, so it is not P;
3)(3) If it is not P, it is not Q, it is not P, so it is not Q.
4)(4) If it is not P, it is not Q, Q, so P;
5)(5) If P is Q and Zhang San is P, then Zhang San is Q.
6)(6) If P is Q and Zhang San is not Q, then Zhang San is not P.
If p is q, some s are p, so some s are q.
If p is q, some s are not q, so some s are not p.
(9) if p is q, some p is r, then some q is r.
(10) if p is q, if q is s, then p → q → s.
(1 1) If P is Q, if R is not Q, then p→q→ is not R.
(12) If P is Q, if it is not P, it is R, so it is not q→ not P → R.
Transformation and deformation of propositions
1, all p is q= Q if p.
2. All P's are not q= If P is not Q,
3. only p has q= P if Q.
4. For P to hold, Q must hold = If P holds, Q also holds.
5. Unless P, q= If not P, then Q.
6.q, unless p= unless p, otherwise q= if not p, then q.
7. Unless p, q= Only P q= If Q, p.
8. as long as P = Q if p.
9. the necessary condition of p is Q =p. the necessary condition of p is q = p if q.
10.p or q= If it is not p, then q= If it is not q, then p.
1 1. No S is p= No S is p = If S is P, it is not P.
12. no s is not p= all s are p = if s is p.
13.S is p= P is s;
14. Is there an S instead of P? P, no S.
15.S is not p= S, not p= Some, not p, but s.
3. Practice the questions, complete the corresponding examples in the book, and analyze the knowledge points and rules used in the examples.
4. Practice questions, practice questions, a lot of practice questions. In addition to practicing the correctness of your own answers, you also need to practice your own answering time. It is best to control the answer time within 90 s.
Debate logic
Argumentative logic is a little more difficult than formal logic, and many students may end up choosing this part of 1-2 by mistake. The biggest reason for the wrong choice is that the understanding of the argument relationship is not particularly in place, and it is difficult to grasp the principle of judging the correct answer, so it is necessary to summarize more when preparing this part.
1. First, get familiar with all the knowledge points and summarize the demonstration methods and structure.
2. The examples in the book are very important. Try to understand each example with 100%.
3, do the problem, complete a test in each class, what kind of argument method do you want to use when doing it, find the argument relationship, mark the process of doing the problem and thinking with a pencil, and answer the question after completion.
Mid-term (July -65438+ 10)
Formal logic and argumentation logic
1, do the questions, focus on the wrong questions, and review the knowledge points involved in the wrong questions.
If there are many mistakes, you should review all the knowledge points.
3, right and wrong questions should be analyzed, especially those involving argumentation logic. According to the knowledge points, each answer should be compared with the stem of the question, familiar with the characteristics of each stem and the characteristics of the correct answer, and then know where the wrong option is wrong.
Late stage (1 1 month-exam)
Formal logic and argumentation logic
1, real problem training, thoroughly understand the real problems in recent ten years, understand the difference of options, and understand the solution methods of similar problems.
2. When doing real questions, leave a set of mock exam questions one week before the exam. Test whether the answer time is enough and whether there are any missing knowledge points.
3. Go back to the textbook to sort out the knowledge points, check and fill the gaps, and form a knowledge framework.
Q4: Answer order
The first step is to write a composition and read the effectiveness analysis materials. The reading time should be controlled within 7 minutes, and it takes about 20 minutes to complete the writing of effectiveness analysis. The overall time is controlled within 27 minutes and not more than 30 minutes.
(2) The second step is to write a composition within 30 minutes.
The third part is to do math problems, which should be controlled within 50 minutes.
(4) The fourth part of the logic problem, the logic problem is controlled within 1 hour.
⑤ The remaining time is used to paint the answer sheet and check whether there are any mistakes, leaving at least 5 minutes.
Question 5: Review precautions
(1) When doing logic problems, don't add or subtract information that is not in the stem or options through misreading or misunderstanding. (ps: That is to say, if you don't add drama to your brain, you will make a mistake. Do the questions in strict accordance with the logic of doing the questions ~ it is best to formulate methods to do the questions when reviewing, and don't be emotional ~. )
(2) argument logic although only 10 questions, 20 points, but less don't underestimate. You must study hard. Because argumentation logic will be involved in validity analysis, if you don't learn it well, it is impossible to write high marks in validity analysis writing.
④ Logic is not only pure logic, but also closely related to other disciplines, such as conditional sufficiency judgment in mathematics (3 points * 10=30 points), which fully involves logic issues and needs logic. Writing will also use logical argument validity analysis, that is, to find logical loopholes to write an article, while argumentative writing is to write an article without logical errors. So does it have anything to do with English? For related English reading, you can find the answer through logical connection context. We must study hard and learn all logic well, which is not only related to our logical achievements, but also related to writing, mathematics and English.
Finally, I sorted out the information that can be used for the management of the joint entrance examination:
① Manage real questions over the years+analyze PDF.
(2) the formal logic necessary formula summary doc
③ pdf of the most complete mathematical formula for the entrance examination.
④ There are two real English questions over the years.
⑤ High-frequency vocabulary for postgraduate entrance examination
⑥ Summary of English composition templates