First, the test paper scoring standard.
Fill in the blank of the first question in the "self-test" section: 1- 1.5 points per space, ***20 points. Judgment of the second question: 2 points for each question, *** 10. Choice of the third question: because it is an indefinite choice, each question will score 2-3 points, *** 1 1 point. Calculation of the fourth question: 0.5 point for each question in the first small question, *** 10 point; The second vertical calculation check, ***5 points; Take 2 points for the third off-topic calculation, and 4 points for * * *; The fourth item is calculated as 5 points.
The "I can solve" part consists of four application problems, each with 9 points and ***36 points.
Challenge yourself consists of two parts, each with 10 and ***20.
Second, the views on the proposition.
After reading the preface on the paper, students completely forget the tension and pressure of the exam and are surrounded by a joy of success, which further enhances their confidence in solving problems accurately. In addition, there are innocent and lovely children's heads and lively and lovely animal images on the surface of the paper. These designs always remind students of matters that should be paid attention to when doing problems, which makes people feel cordial.
Part of the self-test questions are flexible and varied, covering all the knowledge points of the basic knowledge of mathematics this semester (first, the understanding of numbers within 10 thousand; The second is angle and right angle; The third is the addition and subtraction of numbers within ten thousand; Fourth, hours, minutes and seconds; Five-mixed operation and its application).
The "I can solve" part mainly designs four different problems in four different situations to examine students' actual problem-solving ability.
"Challenge yourself" provides a space for students who have learned enough to challenge themselves and show themselves.
Third, the examination situation.
All 69 students in my class took the test, with an average score of 98.77, and 58 students got excellent grades, accounting for 84.06% of the total number. 5 people with good grades, accounting for 7.24% of the total number; Six students reached the standard, accounting for 8.70% of the total number. Compared with the brother class in the same grade, the biggest advantage is that there are no students who fail. These data objectively reflect that students' mastery of knowledge and ability to answer questions are satisfactory.
Fourth, the impact on future teaching.
This paper highlights the key and difficult points in mathematics teaching this semester, which can accurately detect students' mastery of basic mathematics knowledge this semester, and also examine students' comprehensive ability to use knowledge. Through the final quality inspection, the gap between our class and our brother class in the same grade is exposed, mainly because most students are careless in oral calculation and calculation, which has a lot to do with the lax requirements of teachers in daily teaching. I always feel that even if students forget, there is no need to practice calculation, and they are always afraid of increasing the burden on students. In this way, students will develop a bad study habit of not calculating carefully for a long time, and practice has proved that necessary exercises and consolidation are also indispensable. Another reason why students lose points is that they are not careful in reviewing the questions. After the papers were handed out, the teachers had not had time to comment. As soon as students see the wrong questions circled, they immediately correct them themselves, which shows that students are not really careless. Next semester's work should focus on cultivating students' good study habits, and make the work of cultivating students to read and examine questions more profound and solid.
Verb (short for verb) suggestion.
I hope that the future papers can not only comprehensively examine students' mastery of basic knowledge (divided into single and comprehensive items), but also examine students' ability to use knowledge, and also give students who have the spare capacity to study a development space.