Spark thinking is a combination of live teaching and AI teaching. The classroom learning atmosphere is relatively stronger, and you can interact with teachers and partners in real time.

Zebra thinking mainly adopts AI teaching. Learning forms are richer, and it is relatively easier to stimulate children's learning freshness. And zebra thinking has five classes a week and arranges a day to review.

2, the class process is different

Compared with spark thinking, zebra thinking is childlike and suitable for young children who are not interested in mathematical thinking. In addition, the "mathematics in life" part of zebra thinking is also cleverly designed.

Spark thinking pays more attention to the combination of learning and practice in the course, and its extremely perfect after-school review and consolidation link is more suitable for some basic children to improve in class.

3. Adapt to different age groups

Spark thinking is suitable for children aged 3- 12, and zebra thinking is more suitable for younger children.

4. The curriculum system is different.

The course of spark thinking covers a wide range and the course is systematic, so children can learn more knowledge. However, from our previous research, there is a phenomenon that spark thinking is partially ahead of learning, which is also the reason why many parents say that spark thinking is difficult.

Zebra thinking is currently in the stage of perfect development. However, the overall development progress is relatively fast, and it has been updated to S4 level, which means it is suitable for children aged 3-7 to learn.

5. Learning links:

Spark thinking: adopting the "six-step method in class", in turn: curiosity-exploration-speculation-application-reflection.

Zebra Thinking: A class is divided into five parts, namely: video interactive class-classroom test-mathematics in life-I am a little teacher-learning report.