In the eyes of many people, it may be said that this distinction is not that girls are inferior to boys in mathematics. In my opinion, this is totally unreasonable. When we were at school, many girls' math scores were not worse than boys', even higher than boys'. Why do you deny girls' math ability because of this distinction?
I think the most desirable place to divide books is to teach students in accordance with their aptitude. From our perceptual thinking, girls are generally more perceptual, so they are suitable for observation and careful classification. Boys are more rational, so they are more suitable for logical thinking and practical ability. Although this does not represent all, in most cases, there is such a distinction. Therefore, the men's and women's editions can better improve the weaknesses of both sides, and there is no need to distribute them equally as before.
I think what I hate most at school is math, because my spatial ability and logical thinking ability are really weak, but my calculation and memory are good. So if we have this kind of auxiliary teaching material for men and women, I think it will be of great help to my study. When I saw this news, I actually envied my classmates and didn't think it was so-called sexism at all.
In my eyes, everything has its rationality. Since there will be such differentiated teaching materials, it shows that there is such a demand. If you have time to discuss sexism here, you might as well go home and ask your children. Can this really help them with their studies? There are tens of millions of supplementary materials, and improving grades is king.