Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Sorting out and using methods of wrong problem books in senior high school mathematics
Sorting out and using methods of wrong problem books in senior high school mathematics
I believe that many students will encounter such a situation when learning mathematics: obviously this problem looks familiar, and I seem to have encountered it myself. At that time, they made a mistake, but they just couldn't remember what the correct solution was and made a mistake. This shows that you have not really mastered this knowledge point, or that you have not mastered it firmly enough. Are you sure you can get full marks when faced with an explanatory test paper? People can always learn more from their own failures, so you need a set of wrong questions.

Sorting out the wrong set of questions is to copy down the questions that are missed in peacetime and exams. You should not only write down the correct answer, but also add the wrong answer, and then analyze the reasons for making mistakes, such as not mastering the knowledge points, ignoring the scope of the conditions of use, or careless calculation errors. There are many knowledge points in mathematics, and they are relatively independent. I always don't know where to start reviewing before exams. In retrospect, I seem to understand the basic principle, but I can't remember when I need to use the exam. The wrong problem set is like a prescription, which includes both descriptions of symptoms and drugs for symptoms. By comparing the wrong problem sets, we can quickly find our own shortcomings and consolidate them to avoid making the same mistakes again. It's not terrible to fall once, but it's terrible to fall in the same place twice in a row.

Therefore, it is suggested that students can set a set of wrong questions in the first round of review and when the teacher systematically combs the knowledge points. People who miss this time can also be classified according to their own knowledge points or the reasons for doing something wrong, which is convenient for later search and sorting.

The upgraded version of the wrong question set is that there are not only wrong questions, but also good questions. I believe that students who have read all the questions will remember some of them deeply. Some need comprehensive and detailed classification and discussion, and they will fall into the trap if they are not well considered; Some seem to have a huge amount of calculation, but actually thinking in the opposite direction is just a piece of cake (this situation is particularly prominent in multiple-choice questions); Some conditions are numerous and difficult, and I don't know where to start (such as the last additional question). In fact, if you let go of your fear and take it step by step, you can complete most of the steps. The collected questions can help you find out the questioner's thoughts and usual examination methods, and see through the traps and tricks. When you can beat your classmates with a complicated question, what other questions can beat you?

In fact, many students have the habit of assembling the wrong questions and doing them again, but what is commendable is persistence. The wrong problem set is not only applicable to mathematics, but also to politics, history and other disciplines. It provides you with a framework of knowledge, reminding you of the key points of the exam and your remaining shortcomings. More importantly, everyone's wrong problem set is unique, it is your own secret of Wulin.

Mathematics is one of the subjects in the college entrance examination, so we should study it seriously from the first day of junior high school. After entering high school, many students often can't adapt to mathematics learning, which in turn affects their enthusiasm for learning and even their grades plummet. There are many reasons for this. But it is mainly caused by students' ignorance of the characteristics of high school mathematics teaching content and their own learning methods. Many students pin their hopes of improving their math scores on doing a lot of exercises. I don't think this is appropriate. I think, "Don't judge heroes by how many questions they do." The important thing is not to do more questions, but to do them efficiently. The purpose of doing the problem is to check whether you have mastered the knowledge and methods well. If you don't master it correctly, or even have deviations, the result of doing so many questions is to consolidate your shortcomings. Therefore, we should do a certain amount of exercises on the basis of accurately mastering the basic knowledge and methods.

Secondly, we should master the correct learning methods. In order to train their ability to learn mathematics and change their learning methods, we must change the learning methods that are simply accepted, learn to learn to learn by accepting learning and inquiry learning, cooperative learning and experiential learning, and gradually learn the learning methods of "asking questions, exploring experiments, discussing, forming new knowledge and applying reflection" under the guidance of teachers. In this way, through the change of learning methods from single to diverse, our autonomy, exploration and cooperation in learning activities have been strengthened and we have become the masters of learning.

In a word, for senior high school students, to learn mathematics well, they must study mathematics with strong interest, actively spread their wings of thinking, actively participate in the whole process of education, give full play to their subjective initiative, and study mathematics happily and effectively.