Personally, the review process of mathematics can be divided into four stages: ① basic stage; ② strengthening stage; ③ sprint stage; ④ leak detection and vacancy filling stage.
From early June to mid-August as the basic stage.
As for time, it is suggested to spend the main time of the day reviewing math and English at night. I think it is more appropriate to start specialized courses in mid-August.
Personally, I think it is relatively early to review the postgraduate entrance examination from the beginning of June, and it should be reasonable to allocate two and a half months for basic review.
The review of the basic stage is to lay a good foundation and prepare for the next intensive stage. At this stage, three textbooks are recommended: Advanced Mathematics (published by Tongji University), Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (published by Zhejiang University) and Linear Algebra (published by Tongji University). Of course, I personally think that linear algebra is relatively simple and can be ignored. Students with a slightly better foundation can go directly to the second step of intensive review. The basic review is mainly based on the textbooks recommended above. Read and understand the textbook thoroughly. You'd better have an outline at hand when reading. The outline will not change every year, and you can completely look at the outline of the previous year. Generally, freshmen study mathematics. It seems to be more difficult, and I even feel that I have forgotten what I learned in college. But don't worry, as long as you are willing to review in a down-to-earth manner, there will definitely be no problem.
In advanced mathematics, we must know the details of each test center. If we find it difficult, we should bite the bullet and think carefully for ourselves. Whenever we encounter a little difficulty, never ask others, teachers or directly look at the answers. What has not been thought by our own brains will never become our own. It is not recommended to do the questions in the textbook for the review in the basic stage, because the questions in the textbook are far from those in the postgraduate entrance examination. If the foundation is too poor, you will not take the postgraduate entrance examination, which will only waste time. Many people may find it difficult to test the law of large numbers, variance and hypothesis of probability theory, but I believe you can read it several times and understand it thoroughly. I didn't study probability theory in college, and I had a headache at first, but after reading it several times, I finally got over it. The possibility of interval estimation and chapter 8 exam is very small. I only took the fill-in-the-blank question once in the last ten years. If I feel really embarrassed, I can give up. At present, the possibility of being admitted is very low.
In the basic stage, it is recommended to review the textbook twice, that is to say, you should read the textbook at least twice, of course, it is best to read it twice, but for those difficult and important parts, you can read it 3-4 times and be sure to understand it thoroughly. Remember, math is never rote.
Mid-August-165438+1mid-October or165438+1the end of October.
In terms of time, it is suggested to spend half a day reviewing, and the other half a day and evening reviewing professional courses and English. Political advice is to start reviewing in early or mid-June.
Three months should be enough for intensive review. At this stage, it is suggested that you use two tutorial books, namely "A Book for Mathematics Review for Postgraduate Entrance Examination (Wendeng Chen)" (hereinafter referred to as the encyclopedia) and "Guidance Notes on Linear Algebra (Li Yongle)" (hereinafter referred to as the handout). Some people say that The Complete Works of Chen Wendeng is a difficult book, but I think that only by exercising in difficulties can we do well in the exam. The number of lines in Li Yongle's handout is very good. A big problem with the number of entrance examination lines in 2008 is the deformation of the above example. Specifically, you can flip through the handouts and compare the questions in 2008.
How to use counseling books is perhaps the most puzzling and expectant question for everyone. Let me tell you something. Counseling books are written by well-known writers and have been selling well for many years, so don't doubt the quality of these two counseling books I recommend. After reviewing in the basic stage, I believe everyone has mastered the basic knowledge points of mathematics. There is a little knowledge in front of the tutorial. We should read it carefully, think about it and remember it. This is the first step in use. After that, you can't look at the examples directly. We should first give our brains 3-8 minutes to think. If there is no clue during this period, please look at the answer again. Why are you doing this? If you can think about the above problems by yourself, I believe you will be very excited and excited, which will further enhance your confidence in learning and make the next review more passionate and confident. If you don't figure it out, then this question will leave a deep impression in your heart, so when we see the answer, you will be suddenly enlightened. I believe that after you cheat, the answer will be engraved in your heart, and I believe you will remember it deeply next time you see a similar question. After reviewing each chapter, I suggest you do a proper amount of after-class questions, but not too much, just take a small part to do. Please don't think about each question for more than 10 minutes, otherwise it will be a waste of time. Actually, I still think the topic doesn't have to be written on paper. You can also draw casually on early draft paper. You can't do it if you can. It doesn't make much sense if it's not written neatly.
According to personal characteristics, the three subjects can be reviewed in sequence or alternately. However, I still suggest reviewing the high number first, then the probability, and finally the number of lines, and then conducting 3-4 rounds in turn. I think the number of review rounds of counseling books is very important. If you only review 1-2 rounds, it seems that there is no effect, and you may not do similar questions in the future. Don't put off a round of review for too long, or you will forget the front and the front. It is suggested that the first round lasts 30-40 days, the second round lasts about 30 days, the third round lasts about 20 days, and the third round lasts about 10. If the first round lasts 40 days, the fourth round still lasts 40 days. The existing problems are: first, it takes too much time; Second, it doesn't read carefully. 1-2 rounds of review must be comprehensive, the topics should be appropriate, the key and difficult points should be marked with colored pens, and your own understanding should be written down, so that you can review the third and fourth rounds quickly in the future. The third round of review is mainly to review the traces left by the last round of 1-2. At the same time, you should also scan other examples with your eyes to see if you can do it now. If not, continue to mark it as the fourth round to continue reviewing. The fourth round of review is the end of the tutorial. This time, you can only look at the previously marked content. If there are still difficult or important questions, take notes and write them down in a notebook. Finally, at ordinary times, we can check and fill the gaps or overcome these diehards. This is also the reason why the next round of time is getting less and less, that is, to really read the book thin.
In particular, talk about Li Yongle's speech. I don't think it's necessary to read through the whole book, because the handout is well written and thoroughly explained, and the topic has strong reference. People who are just reviewing the handout for the first time may feel a little headache, because the front is often mixed with the back, but don't worry, because you can leave this content for the back. To review the line number handout quickly, it takes about 4-5 days for the first time.
For the key questions, key difficulties and important formulas recorded in the fourth round of review, you should take a look at them at ordinary times to deepen your memory.
165438+1mid-October or165438+1end of October-65438+end of February.
It is recommended to spend about 2-3 hours a day. There are about 30-40 days here.
The final sprint took 1 more than a month, mainly doing simulated questions and real questions over the years. In terms of data, I suggest you use 400 math questions for the postgraduate entrance examination (Li Yongle) and the real math questions for the postgraduate entrance examination over the years (the version is not limited). It is recommended to do a set of simulation questions or real questions every two days. Limit yourself to no more than three hours when you do the questions, and then compare the answers for about two hours the next day, and comment on the wrong questions to find out the reasons for your mistakes. It is recommended to do 5- 10 sets of 400 questions, and it is recommended to do about 8 sets of real questions over the years. Except for 2007, the real questions over the years are a bit difficult, and 2008 is a bit difficult. Other years are very simple, and you should be able to answer them in two hours. In fact, the problem in 2007 is only a little complicated, and it is not difficult from the difficulty of the problem itself.
Sprint simulation suggests that you buy that kind of white paper to print, which is similar to the answer sheet, and it is also convenient for you to mark and write down the reasons for the wrong answer.
65438+the end of February to the leak detection stage of the exam.
Maybe math review will be basically finalized at this time, but don't lose heart. Try to arrange 2 hours of math class every day and make a final sprint for your math before the exam.
This stage is mainly to review the notes made before intensive reading and sprint review. In addition, I suggest that you summarize the key part that is most likely to give a big question according to the real questions over the years, especially if you haven't reviewed this key part well yourself, you must seize your last chance. In fact, there are only a few big questions in the postgraduate mathematics every year, and the questions are relatively fixed. Chen Wendeng's book sums up this problem well. I believe that after reading the whole book several times and doing real questions over the years, you can find such questions quickly. In addition, there is a formula that is not easy to remember, so you must remember it.
In addition, it is suggested that you don't need to pursue the latest mathematics postgraduate counseling books. You can use 07 or 08 used by seniors. I compared it. The content of 07 and 08 is basically the same, and naturally it is the same as your counseling book in 2009. This is the case with the postgraduate counseling book. Just change the cover once a year, or rearrange the layout, and sell it as the latest tutorial book, even more expensive than before. But it's okay, because classic things are always classic, and what I hate most are those inferior counseling books.
You can adjust it yourself.
I feel good in English, math and politics this year, but I lost in the professional class. I have reviewed it for more than four times. I hope you can attach importance to specialized courses. Good luck! ; )