How to fill in the college entrance examination volunteers? Ask experts how to fill in the new-South China Morning Post trainee reporter Shi Huiqiong reporter Zhao Han's college entrance examination is over, and there is still a "project" to be completed, that is, filling in the volunteers. Some people say that volunteering is equivalent to the second college entrance examination; Some people also say that volunteering is half the success of the college entrance examination ... In recent days, the reporter visited senior teachers such as Zhu and Nansan Zhongyang, as well as some education experts, hoping that their opinions can help candidates. Accurate evaluation of the college entrance examination results of students with unique skills is good, but the evaluation error will affect the voluntary hit rate, so accurate evaluation is the key. The evaluation mainly depends on the candidates' memories of the answering process, and estimates the score against the standard answers. The more accurate the memory, the better the score. Because candidates are nervous during the college entrance examination and suddenly relax after the exam, some candidates easily forget the facts of answering questions at that time, which directly affects the accuracy of evaluation. Teacher Zhu specially reminded that some candidates tend to only look at the answer results when evaluating the scores against the answers, without paying attention to whether the answering process is standardized or not, and it is easy to "overestimate" the score points. For example, when doing subjective questions in physics and mathematics, whether the logical relationship statement of cited formulas and arguments is accurate and rigorous accounts for a considerable proportion in the score. If only the answer is correct and the logical relationship is confused, some scores will still be lost. Therefore, candidates should carefully compare all the steps of the standard answer. "It is a bit difficult to predict when estimating the integral!" Teacher Zhu believes that subjective evaluation is relatively flexible, like the most typical composition questions in Chinese exams. On the same answer sheet, some raters think that the angle is good and the writing style is unique, while others think that the literary talent is poor or the conception is poor. Each rater's understanding of the answer sheet may be different, so it is a little difficult to grasp the scoring accuracy of such questions. So, is there an insurance evaluation method? Teacher Zhu suggested that candidates can estimate a highest score and a lowest score when evaluating individual scores. If there is little difference between the two, it means that the reference value is relatively large; At the same time, candidates can multiply this difference by the mathematical "golden ratio" of 0.6 18, plus the estimated lowest score, and then the score is closer to the real score. Don't forget to ask the teacher when the candidates grade. Teachers reminded that if candidates are not sure, it is best to communicate with teachers for evaluation in order to get meaningful guidance. Don't be depressed or jump to conclusions easily and delay yourself. Boldly and cautiously fill in the volunteers, although many people have the idea of "lottery" for filling in the college entrance examination, thinking that "it is better to fill in well than to be lucky". This view may be somewhat biased, but whether the voluntary reporting method is appropriate and objective will really have an important impact on the admission results. First of all, for all candidates, this year's college entrance examination volunteers have obvious characteristics compared with the past-except for the first and second volunteers, the other six volunteers are admitted in parallel, and there is no difference between "first come, first served". Candidates don't have to bother to arrange these six volunteers in order. At the same time, it is worth noting that there is no so-called "obedience to distribution" in volunteering this year. The teacher reminded that it is best for candidates to fill in all 8 volunteers. For candidates who feel ideal in the exam and think they can get on the key line, the teacher suggests boldly choosing institutions with superior teaching conditions as far as possible, and don't be timid when filling out their volunteers, so as not to suffer losses. Teacher Yang reminded that most (sometimes as high as 95%) key institutions are "picky" and tend to admit candidates who are the first choice. At this time, the order of volunteering is more particular. The key major of key institutions is "enthusiasm", and it is impossible to admit all outstanding candidates due to the limitation of admission quota, so candidates must consider it carefully. "Choose a good school, it is better to find a good major!" Teacher Zhu believes that the concept of "specialty first" in the past should be changed. He said that when college graduates choose jobs, many institutions favor the "school brand", and "as long as Tsinghua University graduates are considered to have high quality". To say the least, many people with professional backgrounds find jobs that are not necessarily "suitable". After entering colleges and universities, candidates can still satisfy their personal interests through second education and postgraduate entrance examination. Clever choice of hot and cold majors For candidates whose scores are within the scope of undergraduate courses, geographical factors can be considered more when choosing schools. The teacher suggested that in the past, Nanning candidates liked to stare at universities in Shanghai, Beijing, Wuhan, Guangzhou and other big cities and coastal areas, and even "didn't even look at the schools in the northwest, southwest and northeast", which led to the concentration of the application scope, and the candidates were prone to "crash" and lost the election. Teacher Yang suggested that if the candidates' evaluation scores are average, they might as well choose some schools in slightly "cold" areas. He said that due to geographical factors, the climate environment of some schools in these areas is slightly worse; Some roads are far away, the traffic is not very convenient, and you need to change trains halfway; Some economic consumption levels are slightly weak, which often makes some parents not optimistic. However, the teaching level of quite a few of these schools is still good, which deserves calm consideration. He suggested that many colleges and universities have special enrollment websites and online profiles, from which candidates can get as much information as possible to help them choose. In addition, the college entrance examination scores and enrollment data published in magazines such as Learning can also be used as a reference for candidates. How to choose "hot and cold" major? Teachers suggested: Just like "the finance major used to be very hot but not hot now, and the normal major used to be very cold but not cold now", it is difficult to predict whether the temporarily unpopular major will be popular in the future. But hot majors also have their own "hot" laws: first, majors closely related to the market will be "hot"; Second, professional conferences in line with the internationalization process are "hot"; Third, high-tech majors related to the degree of informatization will be "hot". After years of experience in filling in the seven taboos of volunteering, experts summed up the "seven taboos" of volunteering. If candidates can think about it carefully, it should be helpful to fill in their volunteers. The first is to avoid "parental volunteering". Some parents just impose their parents' will on their children from their own experiences, making the examinee's volunteer become a parent's volunteer. As a result, their children have no interest and motivation after going to school and are very angry with their parents. Second, I don't understand the policy. If you want to fill in your volunteers, you must first understand the enrollment policy and enrollment methods. You must understand and be familiar with the newly introduced reform measures, and understand what impact the enrollment reform measures will bring to candidates' further studies. Three bogeys: not seeking truth from facts and doing what you can is the basis for filling in your volunteers. It is often biased to fill in your volunteers without finding a suitable position, and even cause irreparable losses. Four taboos "famous brand+popularity+disobedience to deployment" have become the formula for some candidates to fill in their wishes for further studies in recent years, and it is also an important reason for high-scoring candidates to fail in the list. Five bogey candidates must have a gradient in their volunteers, so as to give full play to the role of each volunteer and improve the chances of being admitted. Six Avoid Carelessness Most of the freshmen admitted every year are admitted according to their own volunteers. Some are satisfied, but a few are disappointed. This is often because these students are not serious about their first choice when they volunteer. 7. Do not fill in the volunteer form in violation of regulations and accurately reflect the wishes of candidates. It happens from time to time that you are mistakenly recorded or lost because of irregular reporting.

Please accept it, thank you!