Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Last month, I began to review the mathematics for the postgraduate entrance examination. What do you think of advanced mathematics textbooks? Do you want to see those theorem proofs? Some proofs don't
Last month, I began to review the mathematics for the postgraduate entrance examination. What do you think of advanced mathematics textbooks? Do you want to see those theorem proofs? Some proofs don't
Last month, I began to review the mathematics for the postgraduate entrance examination. What do you think of advanced mathematics textbooks? Do you want to see those theorem proofs? Some proofs don't quite understand. First, the problems in the review of mathematics for postgraduate entrance examination: After the intensive review in the previous stage, mathematics has a general understanding of various knowledge points. However, due to the scattered knowledge points and wide coverage, students usually forget where they saw and the front part. Most knowledge points are still unfamiliar and have not formed a complete system. It can only be the part that does more questions, and the impression will be deeper. Because it is difficult for us to systematize what we have learned in the basic stage of learning, after reviewing one course, most of the knowledge of another course will be forgotten. These situations are universal problems that will appear when reviewing mathematics at this stage. Since we can't escape, we should solve it head-on. Since I can't remember it all, it's all broken. What we need to do in the strengthening stage is to consolidate these knowledge points by doing, changing and summarizing the questions.

Second, the time schedule for the math review of the postgraduate entrance examination [the allocation of places in the whole postgraduate entrance examination class and the joint recruitment class] may not be as rich and concentrated as the summer vacation, but we must firmly believe that time is squeezed out and create more value in a limited time, so we must make a reasonable time schedule. It is recommended to keep three to four hours of math study time every day. Students can decide the specific study time freely, but the study time must be guaranteed. It is best to arrange the time in the morning or evening, because the morning is full of energy and quick thinking. During this time, learning mathematics will achieve good results, and reviewing and training what you have learned at night will further strengthen your memory and make your knowledge more solid. Mathematics review is a long-term project, and the key lies in perseverance and persistence. Only in this way can you achieve final success. So I hope you can be strict with yourself and ensure that you can complete the corresponding learning tasks every day. At this stage, due to the increase of political study time, you may feel that you can't balance the time of each subject. But please note that mathematics accounts for a large proportion outside 500 points. As the saying goes, "He who gets mathematics wins the world", no matter how tight the time is, you must make sure to review mathematics for 3-4 hours every day. Each round of review ensures such a progress: advanced mathematics is finished in 20 days, linear algebra in 7 days and probability theory in 7 days. The specific requirements for doing math problems are: to be steady, not to ask for more, not to ask for speed, to strive to finish the problems that should be completed at this stage, to have a certain grasp of the knowledge points and corresponding questions of each problem, to think more, and to draw inferences. Because each student's review situation is not exactly the same, but I want to remind you that you must develop good habits in math review and work out the math problems you get from beginning to end. This is a kind of training of computing ability. In recent years, there is a proposition trend that there are no strange questions, but basic questions, accounting for at least 60%, intermediate questions accounting for 30%, and difficult questions accounting for about 10%. For intermediate questions or difficult questions, if you have a solid grasp of the knowledge points, then the questions here are not very difficult. Therefore, at this stage, it is still necessary to grasp the foundation, lay a solid foundation, and strive for a breakthrough in the strengthening stage. Editors should try to solve problems by themselves after mastering relevant concepts and theories. Even if they can't do it, they will have a deeper understanding of basic concepts and theories. Because mathematics is a subject of understanding and application after all, you can never master it skillfully without practice. If you can't figure it out, look at the problem-solving ideas and guidance in the book, think again, if you still can't figure it out, finally look at the detailed answers in the book. It is not the most important thing to see how a problem is worked out. The important thing is that you can use it in the process of doing the problem through your own understanding. So don't forget to choose two exercises to consolidate after reading the math examples of the postgraduate entrance examination. Don't belittle your confidence because of some difficult problems.

Entrust help to provide friendship