Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Do you distribute draft paper for the joint entrance examination of management? Paint the answer sheet with a pen? Should math, logic and writing be tested together or handed in once? Examination time
Do you distribute draft paper for the joint entrance examination of management? Paint the answer sheet with a pen? Should math, logic and writing be tested together or handed in once? Examination time
On February 26th this year, 199, I took the entrance exam in the morning and took it for 3 hours.

A set of papers for three subjects, printed together. Take the exam together, hand it in together, and decide which one to answer first.

Mathematical logic: Take 2B pencil to smear the card and write an answer sheet. The answer sheet exceeds the required number of words 100. It's best not to use a pen whose ink doesn't dry easily. This answer sheet is easy to be infected and the ink is not easy to dry. It's a bit like smooth cardboard, better than 80A4 paper.

Writing is scanned on the computer screen, and it is best to use thick fonts, which is particularly messy. After scanning, there is no grid, only text can be seen.

As for the allocation of answering time, I'll give you a suggestion, which you should decide according to your own situation.

If you are well prepared, I suggest you answer the composition first, and then choose the math 15 question quickly. Those with high accuracy can be killed in seconds, and those that can't be solved at a glance can be skipped directly. Do the problem 15- 17 as quickly as possible, and keep it within 30 minutes (as much as you do). Then do the logic, and then come back to do the math the rest of the time. If you do logic fast enough, you will throw 5-6 courses in math, and you will be fooled. For example, it takes a lot of time to judge the adequacy of calculation. Unless you practice very well, you will never have enough time. The other extreme of insufficient time is that you can't do anything, so sleep for two hours.

Three hours is very stressful, and it takes five minutes to stamp. The test papers will be handed out two or three minutes in advance. Don't look at the papers at this time, or you will start answering questions when you hear the bell if you strictly deal with the examination discipline according to the violation of discipline. It takes two or three minutes to write down all the names and put them on the bar code.

You don't need to bring your own scissors for the joint entrance examination of management. Other postgraduate students must bring their own scissors. The entrance examination papers will be distributed uniformly throughout the country, and the arrangement of examination rooms is that all examination rooms are entrance examinations. In this case, they will be uniformly sealed.

Therefore, it will be regarded as a violation of discipline to remove the graffiti and reserve a safe time of 3 minutes to prevent the bell from ringing or the graffiti from being completed. This is not the college entrance examination, considering that it is not easy for any child to muddle along ... who cares if there are any minor problems? If you don't hand it in, write it when the bell rings If people are in a bad mood for invigilation, you won't get any grades ... never let others refute you. ...

There is 170 minutes to use effectively, the composition takes 45 minutes to answer questions, 600+700 words take 40 minutes to finish, and 1 minute to read the questions. When you need to practice, apply the back template directly, and then find the logical defect of 1-2 in each paragraph. The first validity analysis is so far, I can't understand the question. Then the second composition should be conceived while writing. There is no other way. I'm thinking, I can't digress. Put forward the argument first, then the argument 1, argument 2, the connection between arguments, the way of arguments, and the writing of eight-part essay are all similar. If you often write papers in English, writing this argumentative paper is as simple as playing, otherwise it will be difficult for freshmen to write this. This composition is 50 minutes at most. You must do it, or your fate is not in your hands, but depends on luck.

Any mathematical logic can be answered first, but it may take 70-80 minutes to finish if you are afraid of tight time and poor psychological quality. In this case, there are still 40-50 minutes, and the math answer will be stuck for a few minutes. In this case, it may be time to answer ten questions, and at the end of the day, the greater your ideological pressure, the more flexible your thinking and mind will be. Formal logic can be killed in seconds, so the safest way is to kill all the questions of formal logic in seconds, and then answer 15 math questions and choose simple ones. Then do informal logic questions, that is, choose simple questions, have a look, read the questions twice without thinking, make full logical preparations, and eliminate the confusion caused by nervous factors. Logic should be able to do more than 24 questions, put the rest aside first, and then go back to math. Mathematics is not too difficult to do, but it is moderately difficult to do it every two minutes. As for the difficult and time-consuming initial estimate, leave an answer, so. Look back at the logic problems you don't understand, and continue to look at them, which will probably make you do it 2-3 times, and then the time is up ... so if you practice in situ, you may have logic problems, math and calculation. Normal play, logic at least 48 points, mathematics at least 54 points.

Make some mistakes, mathematics should be 45+ and logic 40+, which means that it is not in place at ordinary times. I'm sure it should be easy to write in place to 45+. Writing exercises in place save the most time and gain the most! This must not be ignored! If you don't practice well, you have enough ability, 35-40 points, and you have enough ability to practice 50 points. I think it's okay! At least, those who lack ability, such as freshmen, have never worked, are immature and have simple thinking problems. These people can get 45 points if they practice calligraphy well, and 20 points if they don't practice naked. Civil servants who have worked for several years can get 40 points without practicing at all. So this place is much worse. For people with poor foundation, if they don't practice seriously, the loss will be particularly great. For people with a good foundation, it is of little significance to practice seriously.

If you practice in the same place, from now until the end of the exam, it will be 6 hours a day, provided that you have finished learning, and now start to do the questions. It can probably reach this level. At least the score of 125 is the score of 145. As for English II, if reading and writing reach IELTS 5.0 respectively, you can easily reach 60, while CET-4 and CET-6 can get by with many skills, which can't reflect the English level ... Some people get 550+ in CET-6, but they can't get 50+in English for postgraduate entrance examination ... The vocabulary mastery of CET-4 and CET-6 reading test is not high, but the quantity is not the quality. If the quantity is good enough, it will be low if it is not enough. Postgraduate English pays attention to the quality of vocabulary, with a high vocabulary, but it can get high marks with a small vocabulary. At least 1600 high-frequency words, 1000 basic words and 200-300 high-frequency phrases have been mastered. A word may have many meanings, such as tire and tire, saw and saw blade, while the word course has systematic meanings, including course, pursuit, communication and the meaning of a dish. For example, if you recite an international, you may not understand it well in a specific context, but if you know the etymology, the word formation can be better, international, mutual, NAT local, country, national-al, international, international and international. At least, if you don't understand well, it means that your understanding of Chinese is also poor. International people should not think of foreign countries at the mention of this word, especially between countries. Then there is the word REFER, which is very annoying ... it has many meanings and often appears, and its meaning is different every time, but the commonly used words are also like DRAW. If DRAW appears, most of the time it is not related to drawing, but the meaning of reasoning, which is commonly used in formal grammar. DRAW also means dragging, which is equivalent to dragging. Interest is definitely not interesting, it is a very colloquial usage. If the postgraduate entrance examination has no brains, you will know that this means interest. ...

It is equivalent to looking up all the words I have known before and knowing them again in the dictionary. This is the disadvantage of China's learning English, and he pursues quantity rather than quality. English words are unique. If you take it out of context, you can't read it completely. Therefore, each word is suitable for a specific context. Don't remember the meaning of Chinese words, so there is no harm ... the meaning of Chinese translation is actually varied.

Then don't worry about coming up with some difficult super words, which is almost impossible. For example, in a quiet situation, saying DUMB and UNSPOKEN, you don't know but you can tell, which means silence. You can also use silent, but you will never use such advanced words as tacit understanding ... Similarly, invisible may appear, or it may be deformed and have other similar meanings. But there will be no invisible words, there may be digging, but there will be no advanced words like Li Jing, so you don't have to worry about that.

Then there is the grammar of formal English. English writing will come into contact with several principles, such as the principle of attaching importance to the tail, the principle of avoiding repeated use of words, and the principle of being as detailed and complete as possible. So there are many commas, which is for completeness and detail. Then there is the formal English grammar. In order to express clearly, clauses are inevitable, so two reasons lead to the nesting of particularly long clauses. At first glance, it is a bit chaotic, which makes the word order and long sentences form, that is, it is completely chaotic. It is the principle of tail weight in English plus these two reasons, and the long part should be placed behind the word order principle. That's what it means. Some structures are put in front, some logical conjunctions are divided, and some are inverted. Add some non-restrictive structures and insert an adverb in the middle, and the word order will be completely chaotic. This sentence is actually very simple to read. I have told you the logical principle of this language. Think independently ... there is something for him to match, so it is important to look at the content. So practice reading more, cultivate the ability to guess words and solve long and difficult sentences. This is very simple. Buy a violent and mindless book, Readers' Choice. But obviously there is not enough time now, so I need to buy 220 English articles for postgraduate entrance examination ... cloze and buy a problem set to start doing, which is the basis of vocabulary. It is good to write a good translation, but it is enough to practice writing, and there is no need to practice translation.

You have to get these in place. English 2 75-80 is not a problem. Don't look so difficult, bid farewell to the infinite real problem with emotion, this low-scoring and inefficient strategy.

From the point of mathematical logic, it is necessary to record the time when doing the problem, see which type has no ideas and does it slowly, and then strengthen these test sites. You can use the strategy of real questions, but if you want to do it selectively, you must practice calculating your own weaknesses.

As for logic, formal logic should be as symbolic and practical as possible. Buy a copy of Discrete Mathematics and look for it ... It's actually universal and almost the same thing. Discrete mathematics is much more difficult than that kind of retarded thing in logic. Practice in place, killing formal logic and people who write logic books is not a problem!