The subject I took at that time was the first, but I thought it was almost the same. Tell me my opinion:
In mathematics, there are two typical gangs: Chen Wendeng and Li Yongle. Can only say that each has its own merits. Summarize their ideas.
Start the review stage (the first round)
1, if you are unfamiliar with the textbook and want to do the corresponding exercises while reviewing, I think you'd better do Li Yongle's review book, in which the knowledge points are summarized concisely and the exercises are not difficult;
2. If you are familiar with the textbook, you can basically say the chapters of the textbook casually and have a strong overall grasp of the knowledge. Please recommend Chen Wendeng's review book, because his knowledge has expanded a lot, and the difficulty is slightly higher than that of Li Yongle. The quality of the exercises is not bad.
The second stage:
In the meantime, I must do more exercises. Naturally, the exercises in Chen Wendeng's review books are of high quality, so I have to review them again. Then I'm doing real questions over the years. Personally, I think the analysis of the two companies is similar. As long as the explanation is detailed, you can choose one according to your favorite style. In addition, simulation questions: Wendeng Chen's ten sets of simulation questions can be done, but the quality is not as high as Li Yongle's 400 sets of simulation questions. Li Yongle's 400 questions must be recommended.
Last round:
You can look at the speculations of various institutions and broaden your horizons. In addition, Li Yongle's sprint 135 is very useful and must be watched.
In this case, your math will be OK.