Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Is the 2009 national exam difficult?
Is the 2009 national exam difficult?
It's harder than before, comparable to 2003.

It is difficult to fill in the blanks in mathematics. It is difficult to ask a big question after the last question (I feel that the answer is good but always incomplete and confused. For example, a triangle problem to give up)

It's too difficult to choose a language. Generally, the last 4.5 is wrong, and to be honest, the last batch is very loose.

English is simple, but there are pitfalls in the exam. Many students who usually study English 130- 140 have dropped their grades.

I did 1 hour for the comprehensive selection of literature, and the difficulty can be imagined. The landlord must have heard that geography is very conventional and slightly simpler than last year. I wish I had answered the analysis questions in classical Chinese, but time is too tight to think about so much politics. Frankly speaking, it's ok. Although there are not many answers, scoring rules must be added.

My classmate said that it was abnormal when he got to 34 questions, and it was extremely difficult to fill in the blanks. Because of the large number of questions, insufficient time, and poor exam results, it is normal.

The landlord above PS can refer to it.