Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - Which book is good for postgraduate mathematics?
Which book is good for postgraduate mathematics?
The sixth or seventh edition of advanced mathematics in Tongji University, the fifth edition of linear algebra in Zhejiang University Press, and the fourth edition of probability theory and mathematical statistics in Zhejiang University are generally officially designated editions. This math high score experience is shared with you:

Mathematics learning

Many people are puzzled about which book is better in mathematics. Honestly, it's all the same. As long as you stick to one set, watch the online school video brush questions and make mistakes three or four times, you will find that all methods are natural and all roads lead to the same goal.

At that time, I began to brush the high number part in June, linear algebra in August, and probability lecture notes in September, and I broke the knowledge points one by one with the teacher's explanation video on the online school of Tiandao Postgraduate Entrance Examination. Since mid-September, I haven't done a new problem, that is, I have repeatedly brushed the books and problems I have read before and constantly improved my knowledge system. It was not until June 1 1 that I took out the real problem and started to do it. I can score 10 for June real questions, including the number of real questions of 16, which is generally considered difficult. It is not recommended that you finish Li Yongle's 660 and decomposition exercises before doing Zhang Yu's 1000 questions, which are too much to digest. You have to understand that when you arrive at the examination room, if you can review every part to the same degree as the first time, the whole paper will be 95% fine. So, choose a set of books, then stick to it and make sure you have mastered every question in that set of books, and you will be stable. I forgot the formula of the last question of my mathematical probability ... I asked the first question, so the whole question was wrong, and the score was 138.