The review process of postgraduate mathematics is a long line. In this intensive stage, many students will fall into the tactics of asking questions. Usually, when practicing, I will do a proper amount of slightly more difficult questions, which will help me to keep a calm mind during the exam and not panic when I encounter problems. However, this does not mean that only the difficult questions are studied in the review process, while the easy questions and the moderately difficult questions are ignored, which will only lead to the failure of the postgraduate entrance examination. We should do the questions with appropriate difficulty and quantity.
Therefore, the instructor of Wanxue Wenhai Mathematics Examination Medical Postgraduate Forum reminds 20 14 candidates not to get into the misunderstanding of doing the questions, practice properly if it is difficult, and don't be obsessed with the problems. After all, the postgraduate entrance examination examines the basic knowledge, which is an acceptable level for everyone. This requires students to make great efforts at this stage. Through the baptism of this stage, both your mastery of the three basics and your problem-solving ability will be qualitatively improved. This stage is the first qualitative leap on the road to preparing for the postgraduate entrance examination.
Here, Wen Hai's math tutor suggested that you pay attention to the following points in the review process:
First, pay attention to basic knowledge
Understand concepts, formulas, theorems and inferences thoroughly and solidly. The most important thing in mathematics is the foundation, but many students don't pay attention to the basic learning. Instead, they are just busy doing problems and want to get high marks in mathematics through the sea tactics. Just like a child who can't walk, he always wants to run directly. Even if he put in more energy, of course, he can't achieve the expected effect.
80% of the questions in the math test paper are basic questions, and there are only a few partial questions and problems that really need to be pondered in English for postgraduate entrance examination. Students recall that when they do their own problems, they don't say how to solve them. Are all the knowledge points involved in the question clearly understood? Can the formulas and theorems to be used be written with a pen? If not, how can we go to the next step to find a solution and write a complete solution process? In fact, most students often need to turn over books when they encounter problems involving knowledge points in the topic. Please clarify the fact that there are no textbooks in the examination room. Therefore, in order to easily master 80% of the basic scores, Wan Xuehaiwen reminded candidates in 20 14 that they must lay a solid foundation before training their problem-solving ability and speed.
Second, use your head and do more.
Many students like to look at examples when studying mathematics, like to look at other people's good topics, and like to look at other people's analysis and summary of good problem-solving methods and steps. That's not enough. Just passively accept other people's things and never become your own. When reviewing textbooks for the first time, you must do some questions by yourself. Don't look at the answer first when you do the problem, try it completely through your own ability. No matter what you do, at least think of yourself first. Only by using your brain can you have a deeper understanding and mastery of knowledge, truly become your own knowledge and have the ability to solve problems independently. Also, don't give up too easily when doing the problem, don't think about going to see the answer later, be brave enough to challenge yourself, don't surrender easily, be sure to think carefully with your head, it's really impossible to ask for help from outside.
Many people think that writing steps is a waste of time. They rely on their eyes for a long time and don't write steps. The result is that they are too arrogant to take the problem seriously. And it is very likely that you will not get full marks even if you encounter simple big questions during the exam.
Third, summarize and systematize knowledge.
Many students complete questions by answering correctly or correcting mistakes, and the value of a question ends here. I suggest that after correcting your mistakes, you read this question again from the beginning, sum up what you did wrong, what are the reasons, and whether there are any new methods, ideas, newly derived theorems and formulas in this question that you don't know. Write all these useful knowledge in your notebook for easy reference and key memory. If it is a big problem, you should think carefully about which subjects and chapters are involved in the problem-solving method, and what is the connection between these knowledge points, so that your knowledge can be systematized and integrated. Only in this way can you realize the greatest value of the topic you have done, and you can really understand a topic. If you can do this, then if you don't have time to do the questions you have already done in the future review, you don't have to take them out and reread them, because you have summed up the essence you want to master, just look at the notebook.
Fourth, ensure the amount of questions.
It can be said that, in a certain sense, the sea tactics are still very reasonable and necessary. Mathematics examination is to solve problems, so no matter how good the theory is, it should be applied to practice and used freely. So after laying a good foundation, we will start to do the questions constantly.
First, choose the topic. The topic should be broader, and the simulation questions and review questions of various famous teachers involve some. This is because everyone's writing ideas are certain, the focus is biased, and the difficulty is similar. Doing questions compiled by different people is helpful to widely absorb and grasp the questions. Only by seeing the questions clearly can we expand our thinking and try all kinds of difficult questions, so that we won't feel caught off guard when we see the papers. This is "universality".
The second is the amount of questions. Practice as much as you can, but not too much, especially in the final sprint. You should concentrate on political and professional courses, so you don't have much time to do math problems. But don't just "set up" math, because math problems will be unfamiliar and you can't find a feeling, so Wan Xuehaiwen suggested that students arrange a problem-solving plan for themselves, such as a set of problems every two days or a set of problems every three days, depending on their review of other subjects and math.
Finally, leave one or two questions as warm-up training before the exam, but don't care about the results of doing the questions at that time, because the examination room is coming soon, and it doesn't matter much whether it is good or bad. The key is to use it to find the feeling of doing the problem.
Finally, I hope everyone must be diligent, practice more and think more in the process of math review! As long as you can persist, you will certainly gain a lot.