Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - I took a math test for the postgraduate entrance examination. How should I review? Do I need to do every problem in the book?
I took a math test for the postgraduate entrance examination. How should I review? Do I need to do every problem in the book?
I took the exam this year. I used Li Yongle's Lectures on Linear Algebra, the complete works of Li Er, with 660 questions, 100 questions and 400 questions. Of course, first of all, read Chen Wendeng's ten-year textbook. Do the questions next to each other after class. Don't be lazy. This is the process of laying the foundation. The foundation is not firm. You should read this book carefully at least twice, and you will get different results each time.

Read the book twice-read the course of linear algebra-do 660 questions-100 questions-that was before August.

After August-review the whole book at least twice-400 questions (do 5.6 sets and find out for yourself) and then do the real questions-the real questions at least three times.

1, Li Yongle's linear algebra course is really good. At that time, I watched the course of linear algebra once, and I watched it directly. After reading it, it was quite cool to do the problem. Basically, all the questions have ideas or the methods and ideas mentioned in his counseling notes. When I was reviewing the whole book, I read his line generation part in only three days, because the general idea is the same as that in the tutorial, but some of it is supplemented or deepened.

2, I want to tell you the basic idea of reviewing mathematics. Postgraduate entrance examination mathematics tests the mastery of basic knowledge. Before that, some people didn't believe it because it was difficult to do the problem. When I really got the math paper, I felt very good. They are all basic questions, and none of them are partial knowledge points. Personally, I think Li Yongle's book is in line with the idea of postgraduate entrance examination, and I have read Chen Wendeng's book, which is really difficult. The proof part of Chen Wendeng's book is better.

3. Probability Theory To be honest, I gave him up at the beginning of the review, because I really didn't learn well myself, especially I didn't like it. The goal is to recite the most basic formulas and ensure that the most basic questions are well filled in the blanks. As a result, the probability of the last big question this year is really special and basic. Don't be like me. If you think it's not difficult, take a good look. In fact, as long as you have the teaching materials and answers, you can completely deal with the last question of the postgraduate entrance examination by doing the questions after class. Oh, if the whole book has a probability summary of 660.400 questions, there is no need to buy a probability counseling book separately.

5400 questions are ten sets of simulation questions, and 660 questions are filled in separately. Two of them must have time to do, 660 questions are the most basic questions to do after reading the book, and they are done quickly. 400 questions were done in 10, which is a bit difficult and frustrating, so it is necessary to do them when the foundation is solid, and there is a big one of 100.

I bought the real question of Chen Wendeng, which is very good. In front of him, I summed up the number of visits to each knowledge point in ten years, from which we can see that those knowledge points are the high frequency or proof points of big questions, which will play a very good guiding role in your review. Do the questions in the textbook at least twice after class, and remember the concepts, especially the formulas. Do the whole book three times, and you will find different gains each time. You have to do the real question at least three times, that is, the first time is slow, and the second time is fast.

400 questions are somewhat difficult, and some people even say that they are beyond the outline or off topic. There are some, but I think it's a benefit. I did 400 questions first, and then I did five sets before I did the real questions. 400 questions were really difficult, and it was a great blow at that time, but I felt super cool when I did the real questions, and the real questions were very simple. My wife said that sentence is very good, and people have a high starting point for review.

Good luck with your review! !