(but it may not be the standard method). Consider Z2.
=
{0, 1} is mod.
2, it is easy to know that Z2 is a field. Z2[x] is a univariate polynomial ring of Z2 coefficient, which can verify X? +x+ 1 is irreducible in Z2[x]. So x? Ideal generated by +x+ 1 in Z2[x] (x? +x+ 1) is the maximal ideal quotient ring Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1) is a field. Quotient ring Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1) has four elements, which are equivalent classes of 0, 1, x, x+ 1. You can write an operation table:+
1
x
x+ 10
1
x
x+ 1 1
1
x+ 1
xx
x
x+ 1
1x+ 1
x+ 1
x
1
0×
1
x
x+ 10
0 1
1
x
x+ 1x
x
x+ 1
1x+ 1
x+ 1
1
X establishes g and Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1), 0, 1, 2,3 is mapped to the equivalence class to which 0, 1, x, x+ 1 belongs. It can be seen that this one-to-one correspondence keeps the operation, so it is determined by Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1) is a domain. Of course, because it is more troublesome to ask (1), you can leave it alone (x? +x+ 1) is not ideal. It only needs Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1) is just a ring, so it can be a ring. On this basis, it is easy to see the multiplication exchange in G from the multiplication table. The unit element is 1, and all non-zero elements are reversible, that is, fields. Note: 4 yuan finite fields are unique in the sense of isomorphism in principle, so since G is a 4 yuan finite field, it must be related to Z2[x]/(x? +x+ 1) isomorphism. ( 1)
A
=
{x
|
x
∈
z,x
& lt
0} and natural number set n
=
{x
|
x
∈
z,x
≥
0} can establish a one-to-one correspondence. F: A.
→
n,f(x)
=
-1-X. so the cardinal number of a is aleph0. (2)
B
=
(0, 1/2) and real number set r can establish a one-to-one correspondence. g:B
→
r,g(x)
=
Tan(π(2x- 1/2))。 So the cardinal number of b is aleph 1. I don't study discrete mathematics, so there may be inconsistencies in terms or theoretical expressions.