Students' satisfaction with themselves not only reflects their awareness of active learning, but also includes their enthusiasm for learning.

(i∈[ 1， 16])

Q indicates the score of students' self-evaluation.

Pi indicates the students' scores on their own consistency.

Di stands for the weight given to students' self-evaluation requirements)

2. Teachers' evaluation of students:

It shows that learning is the main body, which embodies the objectivity, fairness and openness of the model.

= =A(U，V)

(u is the main factor of evaluation,

V is the grading of evaluation factors.

Ci is the weight that students pay for teacher evaluation requirements.

N is the number of people who fill in the valid questionnaire)

3, by teachers through classroom listening, student homework evaluation:

It shows that teachers are instructive to students and helpful to improve their level. It embodies the authority and authenticity of the evaluation.

(1) Establish a comprehensive evaluation matrix.

(2) Comprehensive evaluation

B=A⊕R=(b 1,b2,……,bm)

M(∧, ∨)-The main factors determine the type.

Bj=max{(ai rij)， 1 & lt； = i & lt=n}(j= 1，2，…，m)

The weight in 1.2.3 is calculated as follows to show the validity of the determined score, and if it exceeds this range, it means it is invalid. The range is 0.75 < = m < =1.25.

(0.75 & lt= M<= 1.25 is the validity of students' scores, and q is the total score of students' self-evaluation.

W is the total score of teacher evaluation.

R is the total score of other students' evaluation)

Deficiency and generalization of the model

Advantages:

(1) adopts fuzzy mathematics modeling and fully considers many factors. The evaluation should be as objective, true and comprehensive as possible.

(2) Weighted classification. Let students compete with each other and protect their enthusiasm.

(3) The model is modeled from three aspects to comprehensively evaluate the main aspects of students' self-evaluation. Really reflect the development, guidance and promotion of evaluation.

deficient

(1) There is not a lot of data to adjust the coefficients of the model, which makes the model more realistic.

(2) The determination of the effective range of results is not very accurate, and it is artificially defined.

(3) If this evaluation is invalid, the subsequent treatment methods are not very detailed.

Promotion:

This model can be used for personnel evaluation of innovative and high-tech companies, which is of great help to personnel management of companies with complicated labor.