Your explanation of the topic gives me the feeling that your starting point of expressing your views is different from that of your predecessors. So each has its own reasons. The predecessors described it from the perspective of the whole scientific system. In this system, chemistry and mathematics are both branches of physics, while computer science is subordinate to mathematics. So it can be said that computer science is only a branch of physics and an applied science. This is a subset of physics. However, the depth and breadth of physics research, the research objects and practical experience involved are much wider than that of computational science. In the study of objective things, physics occupies the first place. On this basis, philosophy pays more attention to logical methods, speculation and induction. As for theology, my opinion is respected to the status of philosophy because of its complete logic or its powerful social function of capturing popular logic. To put it mildly, it's a little face-saving Your point is that computer science has replaced or replaced physics in many ways. But these are superficial feelings. If you think about it carefully, you should still serve physics. Personal opinion, for reference only.