Students with poor foundation should first look at the textbooks they have studied in the past, so the textbooks also have emphasis and non-emphasis. I think the foundation of advanced mathematics and calculus should be limit, derivative and indefinite integral, and other contents can be regarded as the application and extension of these three parts. The basis of line substitution should be elementary transformation, the discussion of the solution of linear equation with parameters, the eigenvalue and eigenvector of the equation, which is very important. The basis of probability statistics should be the concepts in the first chapter, including the concept of condition, multiplication formula and so on. The second chapter is geometric distribution, which is the core of this theory, and must be reviewed, especially the average distribution density and conditional distribution density of two-dimensional linked variables, and the characteristics and definitions of discrete real variables. The third chapter is about the data characteristics of data variables, mainly including four concepts: mathematical expectation, variance, linear variance and correlation coefficient. First of all, we should lay a good foundation, and then we can talk about mastering some problem-solving methods and skills, and we should work harder on basic knowledge.
I don't think students who want to take the postgraduate entrance examination should start preparing now, but 20 10 is fine, but if it is late, it will be too late, so they also summarized four stages of math review for those students who got high marks: the first stage is the preparation stage or the paving stage, mainly to look at the past textbooks, so I just mentioned the basic foundation.
The second stage is the strengthening stage. In the intensive stage, I suggest that students take a remedial class. The first function of this tutorial class is to lay a solid foundation as much as possible under the guidance of the teacher, and at the same time understand some problem-solving methods and skills under the guidance of the teacher. This is the second stage.
The third stage should be to do a lot of problems to further consolidate and improve some achievements in the intensive stage. At this stage, you must think independently when doing problems, and don't ask your classmates and teachers around you whenever you encounter problems. Some problems will not be shelved for the time being, but it is possible. At this stage, we must carry forward the spirit of independent thinking. I suggest that the questions done in the second stage should be based on the previous postgraduate entrance examination questions, and more real questions should be done. When you do a lot of questions, you must think independently and summarize. If you just do the problem without summarizing it, you may end up as the saying goes, "Bear breaks the stick", so be sure to pay attention. This period of time lasted for a long time.
After the fourth intensive class,1end of October165438+ early February 65438+so it was 65438+February, and many other subjects were reviewed, such as English, politics and professional courses. At this time, we should pay attention to the methods of math review. I suggest that the review during this period should be about one hour, and it is really impossible to do a few questions in an hour. Some questions are unanswerable. Ask the students around you at once, and don't waste time there alone.
Another thing to tell the students is that the postgraduate entrance examination is different from the college entrance examination. Some students may not know much about the situation. If the total score of the college entrance examination is enough, you are sure to be admitted. It is useless to fail in the postgraduate entrance examination, and the total score is not high enough, so you can't get the admission score. The majority of candidates must pay attention to this.
Should math review start with reciting formulas?
It is very important to really understand some concepts, theorems and formulas before you can remember them. Mathematics is actually a subject based on formulas and theorems. If you can't do it, the score will definitely not go up.
There are some concepts in Review of Basic Concepts that can't be recited only by theorems and definitions. You should deepen your understanding of these concepts and strengthen your memory by doing questions, especially positive and negative questions.
Be sure to find a good textbook and tutorial book.
The importance of teaching materials is like this. If your original textbook is better, then the role of this kind of textbook is still relatively large. If the original textbooks are ordinary, then the importance of such textbooks is less. But anyway, which book you studied in the past was just some basic concepts and theories in that book, because I was deeply impressed in my mind anyway, so I can read it now, but on the whole, I should find a better counseling book. The advantage of a good tutorial book is that I can integrate practical examples into the concept through some examples, so that students can understand it more deeply.
20 1 1 The tutorial book for postgraduate entrance examination has come out now. I have a new book this year. The new book is "Comments on Excellent Questions for Postgraduate Entrance Examination in Recent Ten Years", which sorts out the mistakes that students are prone to make. Another is that we have made some questions in the test questions more detailed. This book can be read by students with poor foundation. Another book was published last year. Published by Railway Publishing House last year. This book should be said to be very suitable for students with poor foundation. Here's the thing. He wrote down the frequency of a certain topic in recent years, then analyzed the topic this year, and then let the students train according to the methods and skills in this book.
For students with good foundation, I suggest doing more comprehensive questions.
For students with a good foundation, I suggest doing more comprehensive questions, which are slightly more difficult. Judging from the situation of some students we have coached in recent years, if we review according to the requirements of our lectures, then this year's exam is very easy to deal with. When we lecture, we also talk more about comprehensive questions, because a trend of proposition can also be said to be a feature of the current test paper, which tends to be comprehensive questions, unlike the general test questions in the late 1980 s and early 1990 s, which are not suitable.
Laws that should be followed in the review of postgraduate entrance examination
When reviewing, I personally think that this should be done from the shallow to the deep, first lay a good foundation, and then consider further improvement. Personally, I think the problem of improvement is this. It is very important to pay more attention to induction and summary in the process of doing the first problem. Otherwise, the knowledge we have learned is still isolated and cannot form a knowledge chain.
It is ok to do some difficult problems properly, but don't do them if they are too tricky. There are few tricky questions now. Generally, the exams are the most basic ones, or sometimes it seems very basic, but it is difficult for students to synthesize. However, this kind of problem is not difficult. In fact, students should do more and look at such problems more. Only in this way can we improve the methods and skills of solving problems.
Generally speaking, if you want to be good at math and get high marks, you must add basic questions, with basic questions first and questions second. If we have a foundation and can master the questions, we can add wings to the tiger and the speed of the exam will be faster. You know, our time is big. The way to deal with big problems is to do it quickly, and students must pay attention when doing it.
Determine your current level of mathematics.
Now, you can find some real questions that you passed in the original exam. The real postgraduate entrance examination questions are not divided into several parts, one is a fill-in-the-blank question, the other is a multiple-choice question, followed by calculation questions and application questions. From the perspective of postgraduate entrance examination, the foundation is assessed by filling in the blanks and multiple-choice questions. Then those of us who have not entered the review can look at these fill-in-the-blank questions and multiple-choice questions and see what we can do to grasp our own foundation.
Will there be great changes in the knowledge points of postgraduate mathematics compared with previous years? Will the math problem of 20 1 1 be difficult?
The knowledge points in the 20 1 1 year exam will not be new, and the knowledge points that can be tested in mathematics through the 20-year unified exam are similar. There can be no new knowledge points. This is to be said to illustrate the difficulty of the annual examination paper. I think it should be basically the same as this year's, and it will not be too difficult. If it is too difficult, it will lead to difficulties in enrolling students.