After 20 19 and 2020, the examinee's response shows that the mathematics part of 202 1 is slightly less difficult than that of 20 19, but the question type of 202 1 is much more rigorous, not as ambiguous as that of 2020, but there are also many pitfalls.

The logical part discussed by many students is undoubtedly more difficult than that in 2020, the proportion of comprehensive reasoning has increased, and the conditions of topics have also increased. Putting it in the management joint exam with tight time largely represents the increase of difficulty.

The difficulty of the effect theory has also increased, most of which are philosophical. Philosophical things are well known and obscure. On the one hand, logical problems are difficult to find, on the other hand, even if they are found, they are not easy to analyze and demonstrate.

English is difficult, logical questions are not played according to the routine, and there is no time to finish the paper, which has become a hot spot on the Internet for a long time after the joint entrance examination for management.

Its difficulty is manifested in two aspects: on the one hand, it involves a little basic knowledge of philosophy, but it is a completely strange field for the comprehensive management department that does not take the political examination, and they are already shivering with the word philosophy.

On the other hand, the topic itself is really difficult, and the focus of many students has deviated. Simply put, the proposer leads by the nose and loses his own judgment, so it is inevitable that he will be confused.