The breakthrough of basic science is the premise of the revolution of applied science. It is a big mistake to treat basic science with pragmatism. The premise of Chen Jingrun's proof of "1+2" is that it is equivalent to a sufficiently large even number. So we can only say that Chen Jingrun's proof is the best achievement at present, not one step away. Obviously, the method of proof has limitations. Goldbach conjecture is a real number theory problem, which can only be proved by real number theory. I once contributed to the Journal of Mathematics with "Even Table Tri-color Theorem as the sum of two prime numbers", but unfortunately it didn't attract attention. I think I have finished the proof of Goldbach conjecture, and I have also proved the "twin prime conjecture" in the same way.
Don't judge a hero by his success or failure, not to mention that he is a successful person and has made remarkable achievements! Not everyone who climbs Mount Everest can reach the top, but everyone who climbs Mount Everest deserves respect. The courage and action to climb Mount Everest itself is much more significant than the summit, which deserves human needs and praise! Moreover, Chen's research achievements in this field were numerous at that time.
Let the square root of even number 2A be m and the number of prime numbers in m be m. I have strictly proved that the number of individual prime numbers in a is greater than (M- 1) 2. Within (even) /2, every m- 1 prime number is divided into an interval, and * * * has m- 1 interval. Because the product formula: ((P2+1)/4) * (1/3) * (3/5) * ... * (1-2/p)/(m-1) is an irreducible function. =2), and the product formula is ((p2+1)/4) * (1/3) * (3/5) * ... * (1-2/p)/(m-1). 1, (where m-1>; =2)。 (where p is the largest prime number in the even square root and m is the number of prime numbers in the even square root) Therefore, when the even number is greater than or equal to 4, at least one of every m- 1 prime numbers will form a prime sum pair until infinity, so m- 1 is the absolute bottom line. That is to say, the Goldbach conjecture of even number 2A has at least m- 1 pairs of prime numbers, and with the increase of even number, it is actually far more than m- 1 pairs.
Because the product formula ((p+1)/4) * (1/3) * (3/5) * ... * (1-2/p) is an irreducible function. And when the even number is greater than 13200, the formula is greater than 1.00045, and when the even number is greater than 10000, the formula is greater than 1.945, which verifies that when the even number is greater than 23500, the number of prime numbers and prime number pairs in the square root is no longer 0, that is, greater than or equal to/. Is this useless? Obviously, it means that Goldbach's conjecture is established, and infinity is beyond doubt. This is a scientific law and an irrefutable truth. Even if I die, it is correct and cannot be overturned.
The most important thing is the process of proving this conjecture. In fact, this pure digital conjecture, even if proved, is only a small branch of mathematics, not to mention its practical application in production and life. But the process of proof needs all kinds of mathematical theoretical tools, and the contribution of this process to the development of mathematics can not be ignored.
Chen Jingrun attached great importance to science and culture at that time, but it was just established. China was poor and weak for more than one hundred years, which ushered in the dawn of the founding of New China and produced the first mathematician in Chen Jingrun, Hua. There are also a large number of geologists, experts in fire protection, nuclear energy, laser and mechanics who have returned from overseas. It can be said that the founding of New China ushered in new vitality for the Chinese nation. Previous generations of scientists laid a solid foundation for China's science and established a complete industry. The national water conservancy construction has also laid a solid foundation for agriculture. Two bombs and one satellite, and the nuclear diving into the water were great achievements at that time.
Especially in the American way of education, if you are a student who has no talent and doesn't like mathematics, it is unnecessary for the teacher to teach you addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. Because there is a calculator, you can get the answer by pressing it twice, so it seems that many people in America can't even count because it is unnecessary. But they gave a lot of high-quality resources to students who really want to learn mathematics instead of "arithmetic" and to people who really love psychology and can stand loneliness. So the students we train here are good at arithmetic, but there are few real mathematicians.
It's like a big science project. What people see is a result similar to the success of landing on the moon. I don't know that thousands of scientific and engineering technical problems need to be broken through for this result, and these breakthroughs are the greatest wealth left by these big projects to human civilization. It is very important to find big projects for technological progress.
But he put forward 1 1 1 ≠ 2, which is a great solution rule, a ceramic variational problem, a theory of life, and a calculation formula that needs to change with shape. There are also practical proof problems in practice, which are more or less infinite theory, based on the point factor in numbers.