Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Mathematics courses - How to analyze the quality of mid-term examination
How to analyze the quality of mid-term examination
1. test questions: the test questions are uniformly formulated by the general school. As far as the whole test question is concerned, except for some subjects that are difficult to choose and easy to choose (from different angles), the rest basically reflect the requirements of the current test question: pay attention to the foundation and reflect the ability.

2. Achievements: From the overall achievements, most subjects have improved compared with last semester, the excellent rate of each grade has improved, and the passing rate has improved significantly.

3. Problems exposed in the exam:

① Poor student foundation

There are some students with poor foundation in all grades. Among the classmates, the gap in single subjects is too big, and individual students score single digits. For example, the low score rate of English in grade six is higher, reaching 18%, and both mathematics and English in grade three are above 20%, which reflects the poor foundation of students.

② Students' ideological understanding and learning attitude.

There are some students in all grades, whose learning goals are unclear and their learning methods are wrong. They have not formed the habit of previewing before learning new lessons, reviewing old knowledge while learning new knowledge, and seeking new knowledge while reviewing old knowledge. Their study is superficial and perfunctory, and they can't study calmly, which leads to some common sense that should be familiar with not being answered correctly.

③ Ability to examine questions

The determination of the depth of test questions and the choice of test methods determine the students' ability to examine questions. Most students don't know the truth that "sharpening a knife doesn't mistake a woodcutter" Don't be busy examining the questions, or even do them in a hurry. There is no basic thinking process, or the thinking method is biased, or the angle of entry is incorrect, or the completion process is sloppy. The organization of the answer language lacks accuracy and logic. The preface doesn't match the latter.