Wang Jietong: Analyzer of the syllabus of the joint entrance examination of management, editor of the national entrance examination for master students of management mathematics, founder of digital genetic method and top ten problem-solving skills, and quickly solve MBA exams and general research questions. Be good at grasping test sites and key questions. According to the examination syllabus, the knowledge points are modularized, the lecture context is clear, and the thinking is rigorous, so that the complex mathematical knowledge is organized and easy to understand. It has played a vital role in the mathematics review of the majority of candidates, and helped students get high marks, which has been well received by students. He has been invited to teach in Beijing, Jinan, Nanjing, Yunnan, Tianjin, Wuhan, Hefei and Zhejiang. MBA, MPA, MPACC, general postgraduate mathematics lecture.

Representative works:

(1) The Hp Boundedness of Weyl Multipliers Journal of Inequalities and Applications (SCI) 2014,2014: 422 springer Publishing Group (doi:10.11.

(2) A Littlewood-Pare decomposition of Schrodinger operator, Journal of north china university of technology, No.3 Natural Science Edition, 2011;

(3) Inscription of Management Mathematics Examination for National Postgraduate Entrance Examination, Nanjing University Press, 2065438+March 2005;

(4) Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press should make great efforts to review the "Guide to High Score of Comprehensive Ability Mathematics for MBA, MPA and MPAcc Joint Entrance Examination in 2065438+06", which cannot be superficial. Some of our candidates are impetuous, that is, they don't pay attention to the basics at the beginning of review and simply browse the textbooks. This is definitely not good. Some of our candidates don't even read textbooks, so they take counseling books at the beginning of review. What is the result? On the other hand, if you wake up earlier, you'd better review with your textbook as soon as possible. At this rate, there will definitely be no good results. Because the instruction book does not elaborate the mathematical theory very deeply, how to understand it only by looking at the conditional conclusion of the theorem? We must understand the background of the theorem by looking at how this thing came from. The process of proof is a process of understanding and application, and we can't lose a link. It is not good to lose one, so I suggest that candidates must pay attention to comprehensive review, lay a good foundation, and improve their problem-solving ability after having a foundation.