Analysis of Mathematics Examination Paper at the End of the First Volume of Senior Two (1)
This examination focuses on students' mastery of the basic concepts, contents and methods of this book according to the annual standards of the new mathematics curriculum standards. The students basically performed normally in the test. The test paper is based on textbooks and covers all the knowledge we have learned in Grade Two. As far as knowledge points are concerned, it includes the understanding of the meaning of multiplication and division, the preliminary understanding of angle, direction and position, mixed operation, statistics and possibility. As far as calculation is concerned, students' ability to use multiplication formula is examined, and multiplication, addition and subtraction operations are appropriately interspersed, as well as vertical calculation of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. The teaching work of this semester has ended. Examination is a test for students and a summary of teachers' work gains and losses. The following is my brief analysis of the test paper:
(1) Proposition ideas and test paper characteristics:
At the end of this year's second grade, the math test paper fully embodies the characteristics of the textbook. On the surface, it can be roughly divided into two categories. The first category is basic knowledge, which is tested by filling in the blanks, judging, selecting and calculating. The second category is comprehensive application, which mainly tests practical problems. Whether it is the type of test questions or the expression of test questions, it covers the mathematical knowledge of the whole book as comprehensively as possible and uses it comprehensively.
(2) Test paper analysis:
1, judging from the paper score, the overall score is good, mainly reflected in the following aspects:
(1) The basic knowledge is solid, and certain basic skills have been formed.
(2) Strong ability to solve problems with mathematical knowledge.
(3) Have good writing habits. This test paper, except for a few students, is written neatly by most students, and the surface of the paper is also neat.
2. Shortcomings in the examination paper: Judging from some questions, teachers pay less attention to aspects, and the phenomenon of losing points is still serious.
(1) pays insufficient attention to calculation, especially the written calculation loses points to varying degrees. Perhaps in the late review period, the emphasis was placed on the flexible use of knowledge, and the understanding and operation of concepts only emphasized the methods in calculation, rather than insisting on checking every day.
(2) Students' understanding ability to solve problems is still lacking. Although many types of problems are explained, students' analytical ability and the ability to draw inferences from others are still problematic. Reflecting on the reasons for losing points may be that students usually have more problems in one-step calculation, fixed thinking patterns, and lack of care and patience, which leads to losing points. In the future teaching, we should pay attention to improving from these aspects.
(3) Improvement measures:
(1) Strengthen students' mastery of basic knowledge, and use classroom teaching and exercises to consolidate students' solid level of basic knowledge.
(2) Strengthen the cultivation of students' ability, especially the cultivation of hands-on analysis and practical application.
(3) Cultivate students' good study habits, including careful examination of questions, timely inspection, careful observation and concrete analysis of specific problems.
Analysis of Mathematics Examination Paper at the End of the First Volume of Senior Two (2)
First, the paper analysis
This math exam well embodies the new concept and target system of the new curriculum standard. Has the following characteristics:
1, the content is comprehensive, covering a wide range, and the scores of each part are reasonable.
Curriculum standards point out that everyone gets the necessary mathematical knowledge, and different people get different development. This volume focuses on the mastery of students' basic knowledge and the cultivation of their basic abilities, and also properly examines students' learning process. The content of the test questions is comprehensive and there are four major questions.
2. The materials are close to life and evaluate the students' ability to connect with life.
The new curriculum standard points out that learning materials should come from nature, society and life. Starting from the familiar reality and knowledge and experience of students, this paper selects the things and things around children, so that students can realize the value of learning mathematics.
3. Flexibility is reflected.
Test students? Possibility? The contents of the book are presented in different forms, which embodies the flexibility of learning methods and thinking and has certain depth and difficulty.
Second, the specific analysis of the test paper
The examination paper is divided into four major questions:
(1).
***7 small questions. The most mistakes are question 8. This question is for students, right? Time? The reason why this part of knowledge is wrong is because some students don't understand that they can run very fast in a short time in running competitions.
(2) calculation.
There are few mistakes in this question, and some students make mistakes because of carelessness.
(3) Look at the pictures and fill in the blanks.
Through the investigation, it is found that some students have no knowledge of direction and location.
(4) solving problems.
***3 small questions. The third question, in particular, is difficult in itself. Through the investigation, it was also found that some students read half of the questions, such as the last small question, and asked to write two flowers. A considerable number of students have only written one kind, which shows that students have not finished reading the questions, so we should pay attention to this in future teaching.
Third, look at the main problems in teaching from the answers:
From the statistical analysis of different test questions, it is found that students have a solid grasp of basic knowledge. Most of the students' writing style is neat, the format is standardized, the students learn vividly, and their problem-solving ability has been greatly improved. However, as can be seen from the answer sheet, students are still lacking in careful problem solving and need to continue to strengthen.
Four. Suggestions for future teaching:
1, strengthen the cultivation of study habits and active learning ability, and further strengthen the habit and ability of examining questions.
2. Strengthen the connection between mathematical knowledge and real life, and attach importance to the process of knowledge formation and ability development.
3, continue to strengthen the basic knowledge and basic exercises in place, a variety of training exercises.
4. Teachers should deeply reflect on students' learning style and thinking flexibility from the mistakes in answering questions, and contact the gap in life and the cultivation of mathematical ability to teach students in accordance with their aptitude.
Analysis of Mathematics Examination Paper at the End of the First Volume of Senior Two (3)
With the arrival of 14, a hurried semester passed. In order to better summarize my own shortcomings in teaching, I made the following analysis of the test paper:
Analysis of test questions: this test has a wide range of propositions, covering all sections of Qingdao second edition mathematics. The difficulty of the proposition is moderate, the basic knowledge and skills are comprehensively examined, and the type of problem solving is unbiased, interesting and flexible, which conforms to the age characteristics of primary school students. This proposition well embodies the concept of curriculum standards.
Reflected in teachers' teaching: from the situation of students' papers, we can see that in the past teaching, I was able to master the basic knowledge of teaching materials to start teaching. However, there are still some shortcomings in some aspects: for example, the classification and explanation of angles in Preliminary Understanding of Angles are not detailed enough, and students are not allowed to learn how to flexibly use the characteristics that acute angles are smaller than right angles to judge the types of angles in triangles.
Analysis of students' situation: 75 students in my class took the exam, and two of them didn't take the exam because of sick leave, that is, two scores were zero. The excellent rate is 94%, the passing rate is 90%, and the average score is above 96. Judging from the students' grades, the vast majority of students in the class have a good grasp of what they have learned this semester, and only a few students need to work hard, such as Chen.
Student error analysis: one question: fill in one, and individual students miss 1, such as Wang; 2 Small problems Individual students have not really mastered the significance of understanding multiplication and division according to intuitive graphics, such as Chen, Gao and Lu. 1 1 The problem of matching small questions belongs to the new content of the new curriculum standard. There may be at most seven ways to match three different objects, but some students haven't mastered it yet.
Two questions: multiplication formula students are very skilled in reciting, and the mistakes are due to carelessness; Division of vertical writing is not standardized, such as Du Xiwen.
Three questions: the most mistakes are 1. How many acute angles does a triangle have at most? Influenced by right triangle, most students have two answers. In the future teaching, let students use knowledge flexibly to solve problems.
Others: Students have a good command of it.
In short, the students' performance this time is ideal and their knowledge is solid.