First of all, talent plays a very small role in the difficulty of the postgraduate entrance examination, which is really difficult for most people. I have a classmate who doesn't know much about science, but he still got high marks. I hope that talent will not be used as an excuse for not studying well.
Specific to review, I mainly talk about my own review methods. I mainly use textbooks and supporting counseling books issued by the school in class. I have read this textbook n times. Except for the summer vacation, I have planned to finish it. Other times, I decided to forget it and read it again. After class, I did half the questions, made the tutorial 1 times and read it twice. Wendeng Chen's counseling book, conveniently reluctantly read it again. Li Yongle did 660 questions for 200 times, but he couldn't do it anymore and lost. Finally, I did several sets of simulation questions, but I didn't do others.
Tell me about the effect of this review. Reading books before summer vacation and doing exercises after class are not effective. One day during the summer vacation, I suddenly counted and time was running out. I put down English and just looked at math. Read tutoring books, do after-class questions and read tutoring books every day. After the summer vacation, I tested the effect. In 2004, I did the real question correctly. Then I became proud and ignored it, and the following questions followed.
Mathematics is depressed:165438+65438+at the end of October1065438+ at the beginning of October has difficulties, low accuracy and often misreads the questions. Math problems are still difficult for some years, but I'm not afraid. My problem is that difficult problems can be done, simple problems must be done wrong, and the calculation accuracy is extremely low. I know a simple truth, the problem of the exam is not the difficulty, but the accuracy, so my self-confidence has been hit hard. If you can't even do simple things well, how can you have the energy and information to do difficult problems?
At first, I used a blank exercise book and did it in a standardized way. Later, I communicated this situation with my classmates. He advised me to write carefully with the checked books. In the following 65438+February and 65438+ 10 months, I did the same. The accuracy is slowly improving. However, it still can't reach the state of senior three. I don't need to check the problem at all. Now I have checked it several times, but I don't trust it. I still have to make mistakes. This kind of problem is also reflected in the real questions in 2006, including miscalculation and misreading.
Experience and suggestions:
I think mathematics is mainly a conceptual problem, and the problem is also done to understand the connotation and extension of concepts more deeply (you can refer to the questions about general probability and conditional probability in Probability last year, and compare them, to what extent do you understand these concepts). This is the theoretical basis for me to choose the above review method, and there is another reason mentioned above. I am lazy and convenient. Pay attention to the foundation and don't pursue problems. For example, there are several problems in the general review of calculus (integral proof). You can't see it at first sight, just skip it. I didn't read them until the final exam. As for the math textbook, I think it's best to choose the one I used before, which can reduce the difficulty. I choose the books for math review guidance according to my own situation. In fact, I think as long as you understand thoroughly, you can get good grades in the exam. If you can finish all the exercises after the math textbook correctly (not by memorizing), you will get a score of 120, no problem at all. Of course, there are also many questions. For example, I know that some students have a good foundation and have done a lot of problems. Finally, they got 149. In short, the review method depends on the individual.
Accuracy is the guarantee, so pay attention from the beginning. My accuracy is getting lower and lower, which should also be caused by the irregular questions in the first and second review. Only with accuracy can we have the energy to pursue other difficult problems.
In addition, talk about the experience of doing real questions (other questions are too different from real questions) There are many real questions, which take a long time to do and analyze. It took me more than a month to finish reading them, and many of them were not ripe enough to understand. Generally, there are problems every year (except for a few years) If you want to get high marks, you must leave enough time for questions. Those problems need time to solve, and other problems don't need to be solved, just need to react quickly.
Pay attention to the wrong questions. For ordinary students, frequent misreading of questions can improve their accuracy and familiarity with knowledge, while for masters, repeated misreading of questions can learn new problem-solving methods and improve their ability.
Also, when you encounter other problems, remember to think hard and find a way to solve them!
That's it. Postgraduate entrance examination is not easy. I wish you success ~ ~
Seeking adoption is a satisfactory answer.