2. The exam not only examines your usual learning level, but also examines your exam skills. Of course, if you want to say that exams are an art, that's true. According to what you said, the first step you have to do is to look at the questions first. The reading question here refers to the first question that you can 100% do, the second question that seems likely to be done, the next question that you may need to think about, and the last question that you don't have to worry about. To put it bluntly, you either don't have enough time or you can't do it directly. It's wrong to do it.

The most important thing: when I say tick here, I want the first impression. The kind that you think you can do at first sight. Don't spend too much time studying these topics.

The above reasons and goals are: many students often find that some wrong questions could have been done, but they didn't do it right in the exam for some reason, resulting in losing points. The purpose is to make sure that you get everything you can.

3. About the auxiliary line of the proof question: In fact, this is similar to how to do the proof question. You can think backwards from the conclusion. If the conclusion holds, then I will deduce what the conditions for the conclusion to hold, and what is known in these "conditions", and this will come out soon. At this time, what you have to do is to construct according to this missing "known". I am a math teacher myself, and there are many students. According to my thinking, it is proved that there is no problem in nine cases out of ten.

For big questions (of course, the branches of such questions are often very high), 90% of the first questions will be done (that is, it is not difficult. Assuming that the first question of each big question will be done first, you are not sure about the following small questions. What you have to do at this time is to do the next question quickly to avoid unnecessary loss of points because of love of war.

If you can't do the first short question, but you can do the second or later question, what you need to do at this time is to do the latter short question quickly, and you can take the conclusion of the first short question as the known condition of the latter short question (pay attention to the answer format, such as (2) the conclusion from (1) ...).

5. Bring tools related to math test, especially protractor. When multiple-choice questions and proof questions involve the problem of finding the angle, and graphs are given in the questions, assuming that you can't do it, you can get the answer directly with a protractor. (It should be pointed out here that 99% of the degrees measured by the protractor in the formal examination are correct, because the angle of the formal examination is drawn by professional software, which is different from what the teacher casually pieced together. In other words, it is not recommended to take the exam at ordinary times, but it is a tried and tested problem-solving skill in the formal exam. )

6. The synthesis of function and geometry can be roughly divided into static problems and dynamic problems. The basis of the solution lies in remembering the theorems and formulas in the book. The best method for static problems is the hypothesis method. If the conclusion is established, we will know what it should be, if not, we will know what it will be. About dynamic problems: In recent years, the question with the highest test frequency is "Q? When is the circumference of a triangle small? Or when the sum of two straight lines is the smallest? This kind of problem is most easily confused with Pythagorean theorem. This kind of question actually wants you to construct auxiliary lines. How to build them? If one of the lines is kept still, the other line will rotate (99% of which is symmetrical), so that the symmetrical line coincides with the fixed line.

7. Time allocation: The simplest time allocation is based on the score: the time you spend per minute multiplied by the score of each question is the time you consume.

8. I don't mean to discourage you here: I want to know myself clearly, don't think I have to get full marks and set myself a reasonable score. If the question exceeds this score, don't read it, don't want it, it's not a bone you can chew on.

PS: Ask me if you don't understand anything.