Some candidates asked, how can we find the correct answer quickly and accurately? In fact, there is no specialty, and it is not by ignorance. In my opinion, the best skill is to master the key points of knowledge and the most common knowledge points.
But one thing is certain, you still can't choose on the premise of mastering knowledge. Then, using some skills can improve the correct rate.
The following is a summary of my problem-solving process when I did multiple-choice questions in the college entrance examination, to see if I can get the skills you want from it:
1, quickly browse the topic and accurately outline key information, such as numbers; For example, "no" and "maybe", you should pay more attention to those words that affect your choice, because it is likely to change some details, which is different from your previous answers.
2. Analyze informational problems according to the problems, because some problems will add some interference information and must be eliminated.
3. If it is a question that examines basic knowledge points, the brain will come up with an answer after reading the question, and directly find the same or closest answer.
4. If it is a multiple-choice question that requires calculation or logical reasoning, I recommend the following five methods, which will surely be fast, accurate and stable:
A, mathematical pure calculation, it is more complicated to push back from the problem, and it is easier to push forward, so substitution method can be considered;
B, exclusion method, which I use most widely, for example, a large number of chemical particles are suitable for this kind of topic;
C, if it is a single choice, directly exclude two options with the same meaning;
D, drawing to do multiple-choice questions, especially math and physics, you can draw more;
E, skip method, I often use this method, remember, don't waste time on a topic, once you exceed the budgeted time, go straight to the next one, and then come back to think. Maybe other topics will enlighten you at that time.
Let's take the topic of history as an example and list two tips, which are super practical:
This technique is based on the historical facts you have, but you still can't accurately grasp the central meaning of the material. Using the following two techniques, your correct rate can be improved from 25% of an answer to 80% or even 90%.
Tip 1: If only one option can be associated with materials and options (such as keywords or key parts, or central meaning), then this option must be correct.
For example, from1915 ~1918, the words "revolution", "science", "equality" and "democracy" in New Youth have almost the same frequency; From 19 19 to 1922, the frequency of "democracy" is less than1/0 of "science" and less than 1/20 of "revolution". This change can be explained by:
A. the mainstream ideology of the new culture movement has changed. B. the national revolutionary movement has been widely supported by the people. C. the capitalist regime model has been denied by the intellectuals. D. the main contradictions in China society have changed.
Comparing the four options, only one option A can be associated with the material option, but BCD can't, so what A said must be right. "19 15- 1922" is connected with the "new culture movement". From "stressing democracy to seldom stressing democracy" to "thinking has changed", you can directly choose A, right away! Without hesitation!
Tip 2: Choose a relatively safe scheme by comparing options. This skill is particularly useful when doing historical puzzles, and it is easier to kill.
Example: 1940 An article pointed out that China is a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, and the bourgeoisie is still revolutionary to some extent. This is the difference between China and Russia. In Russia, "the task of the proletariat is to oppose the bourgeoisie, not to unite it." Its analysis aims at:
A. learn from the experience of Russian revolution B. expand the class foundation of China's * * * production party C. explain the nature of China revolution D. criticize the harm of right-wing mistakes.
This question AB is not controversial. The key is which CD to choose. You may not know what right deviation means, but it doesn't matter. We can choose the right answer by skill. Compared with CD, we can conclude that C is a safer choice.
Why? Because C's "explanation" is a neutral word, "nature" is also a word that can cover many contents, while D's "criticism" is a word with obvious tendency, which limits the bad content and "harm" limits the derogatory meaning. Therefore, if you want to choose D, the requirements for the material are relatively high. He must have words with personal emotional tendencies and bad content.
C does not have this requirement, so whether there are words with personal emotional tendencies or bad content in the material, we can choose C, because C has the largest scope and is a relatively safer option.
Or you can understand it this way. C is a neutral term. Praise, criticism and neutrality are all included in option C, while option D is only criticism. If you can choose D, you can definitely choose C, and vice versa. So when you can't determine the answer by other means, choosing C, a relatively safer option, is more likely to hit the right option!
Having said that, everyone should understand that even the investigation method needs knowledge points to support it, that is to say, it is uncertain to do so without the knowledge you have mastered. Therefore, it is suggested that you should learn knowledge and master some skills in order to get high marks.