How to treat the phenomenon that a large number of students were disqualified from participating in the 20 18 national mathematical modeling competition for college students because of "network communication"? Just like the exam, the invigilation was loose a few years ago, and everyone copied each other and passed a small note during the exam. Not bad, senior and senior also said to copy boldly, not bad.

This year, the invigilation has been strict, an anti-cheating system has been introduced, and some people have reported it. Unfortunately, you were caught. You said, I didn't pass the note, so I peeked, but cheating is cheating.

You think, "Why am I so unlucky? Why did we get caught just by looking at it? Why wasn't it so strict in previous years? " Mathematical modeling is really a pit! "

In fact, you know why, because of the commitment letter you signed.

It's not good for you to extend the time. A blessing in disguise is a blessing in disguise. What I will do in the future is less flawed and aboveboard. I wish all mathematical modeling partners can get some insights and benefits from the competition more or less.

Finally, and most importantly, all students who have violated discipline/discipline should remember to say "I'm sorry/thank you" to your instructor.

Actual situation:

Adding QQ group will directly inform you to cancel the award-winning qualification, but will not inform you, and will send a private letter to the instructor or send it to your email address. The notice of Anhui Province is mainly due to the duplicate checking rate, and adding QQ group is only an extra charge. Many more teams have been disqualified from winning the prize.