In the sprint review, we must first calm down. In view of the backwardness of this subject, it is necessary to strengthen the sorting out of the weak parts of basic knowledge, "emphasize the teaching materials and manage the test sites", check for missing parts, strengthen the comparison and analysis of confusing concepts and laws, and consolidate them with appropriate exercises.
Second, we should pay attention to hot spots. It is a hot topic to analyze the necessary test points of the senior high school entrance examination proposition every year, and pay attention to solving the problem of scoring.
For a considerable proportion of secondary school students, if they want to make great progress through sprint review, it is not enough to do basic questions well, but also to pay due attention to some key points. Generally speaking, the scores of the senior high school entrance examination are not very concentrated. For example, the scoring questions of chemistry mainly focus on the last one or two questions of multiple-choice questions and experimental inquiry questions, while the scoring points of mathematics are comprehensive questions combining geometry with circles or functions. It is suggested that some grading questions should be selected appropriately for targeted review, so as to be prepared.
Second, suit the remedy to the case, fill in the blank and spend time on the cutting edge.
The problems reflected in the mock exam should be carefully and objectively analyzed. See which questions are lost, and find out the reasons. For example, the basic knowledge is not well mastered, the thinking ability can't keep up, or the learning attitude is not correct, the questions are not carefully examined, or the learning methods and habits are not good. It is necessary to conduct an all-round analysis.
Because the time from the senior high school entrance examination is limited, we should insist on "using time on the cutting edge" to coach "short-legged subjects", strengthen the analysis of weak links, see which subjects failed in the exam, calmly analyze the reasons for losing points, and judge whether the subject is weak. If so, then hurry up to make up the basic knowledge of weak subjects and avoid the "short-legged subjects" in the senior high school entrance examination. According to the problems exposed in homework or review exercises, check for leaks and fill gaps. If you have a problem that you can't solve, don't get caught up in it and don't ignore it. You can ask your teacher or classmates!
Third, sort out the wrong set of questions and exercise moderately, and refuse moderate exercise.
In the review, we should find out the gaps and weak links according to our own characteristics and do the questions in moderation. Don't think that the more questions we do, the better and the more difficult it is. The exam can be done selectively in previous years, and the review effect can be improved through repeated targeted training, so as to understand and be familiar with the exam questions and achieve the "mastery" of the required knowledge. But it is important to learn to reflect after doing the questions, be good at summing up, especially when doing the wrong questions, and find and analyze the reasons for doing the wrong ones. Only in this way can we avoid incorrect solutions to difficult problems and bad solutions to basic problems.
Fourth, avoid unnecessary loss of points and improve good habits.
Five kinds of mistakes should be avoided in solving problems, namely: wrong reading, wrong thinking, wrong calculation, wrong writing and wrong copying. Reading and examining questions are the basis of solving problems. Don't rush the reading questions, but implement them word for word. Be careful not to have too many words and miss words, and the language is standardized and fluent, and don't write typos. We should avoid carelessness and be influenced by thinking patterns and answers to familiar questions.
In particular, students in the middle and lower grades should arrange some problem-solving training in a limited time, focus on solving problems that will not score, effectively improve the speed and accuracy of problem-solving and get the points they deserve, so as to achieve "the points they deserve cannot be less, and the points they can get cannot be lost."