These two schools have their own strengths, and the key depends on LZ's own goals. First of all, from the perspective of subject integration, it can be said that no university in China has a higher degree of subject integration than Zhejiang University (of course, this does not mean that Zhejiang University is first-class in every field), but a science and engineering (especially science) institution of China University of Science and Technology, so if LZ wants to study economics and medicine (since LZ consulted China University of Science and Technology, assuming that your direction is not purely liberal arts), Zhejiang University is undoubtedly better than China University of Science and Technology. The engineering course of Zhejiang University, as upstairs said, is also in a leading position in China, and it is also because of the choice of China University of Science and Technology. For science, the overall strength of China University of Science and Technology is very competitive. Science here refers to traditional science (mathematics, physics and chemistry). In physics, the strength of the Chinese University of Science and Technology is definitely above that of Zhejiang University, which can be seen only from its electron-positron collider. In chemistry, both schools are stronger, but the Chinese University of Science and Technology may be a little better. As for mathematics, although it is not as big as Peking University, the two schools are also the best in mathematics in China. The mathematical strength of China University of Science and Technology is relatively general, and there is no particularly weak direction, while Zhejiang University belongs to the strong direction (such as geometric analysis, operational research, probability limit), but it also has obvious weaknesses (such as applied statistics). In addition, the strength of the two universities in relatively new disciplines such as biological sciences is also difficult to compare, because neither is particularly outstanding, at least not the top in China, and I am not particularly familiar with this. There is also a science (also classified as liberal arts in some places)-psychology. Whether Zhejiang University's psychology is the second or the third in China is controversial, but it is not controversial to be the top three in China's psychology department together with Beijing Normal University and Peking University.

In addition, in terms of word of mouth, it should be said that China University of Science and Technology has great advantages, especially LZ's overseas plan is to study abroad, and the brand of China University of Science and Technology is very famous internationally. It can be said that among the schools in China, except Tsinghua Peking University, China University of Science and Technology will be counted. Although Zhejiang University used to be one of the best universities in China before the founding of the People's Republic of China, it was silent for several decades and began to reappear in the last decade, so it was not as prestigious as China University of Science and Technology.

Geographically, this doesn't need much explanation. As said upstairs, the position of the Chinese University of Science and Technology is really bad.

In terms of the number of academicians, China University of Science and Technology won. But personally, I think such figures are only for outsiders to see, because academicians generally have few opportunities to guide undergraduates, and most of the so-called academicians in universities exist in name only. Except for universities in Beijing and Shanghai, few academicians stay in universities on weekdays. Secondly, from the total output of scientific research, academicians are a portrayal of the past, and now they are of no practical use, but more of a personal honor. Most academicians are in their fifties and sixties, even beyond the ancient age. At this stage, no new achievements have been made in scientific research.

Finally, it is only a personal opinion, which may be criticized: the brilliant achievements made by the Chinese University of Science and Technology in the past few decades are obvious to all. As the most distinctive science and engineering institution in China, its performance in many aspects is commendable. However, this year's style of study seems to have a downward trend, becoming more impetuous and utilitarian, which is obtained through my personal communication with students of the Chinese University of Science and Technology and the experience of my classmates and tutors visiting or studying in the Chinese University of Science and Technology. If this momentum is not curbed in time, in the next few years, the University of Science and Technology of China is likely to gradually move away from its glory. On the other hand, Zhejiang University has developed rapidly this year, and there have also been some problems, such as poor management, lax supervision, and a paper incident some time ago. But I was an exchange student at Zhejiang University for a year. In my opinion, the overall quality and style of study of students and teachers in Zhejiang University are very good. The management system needs to be strengthened, and there should be more room for development in the future.